Laserfiche WebLink
<br />range of salinity increases which represents basin development to the year <br />2000, the average loss value has been established at $343,000 per mg/L per <br />year at Imperial Dam. This average value is based on 1976 economic condi- <br />tions in the Lower Basin and must be indexed up to current economic condi- <br />tions. The present (1982) value of projected total economic losses in the <br />Lower Basin due to projected salinity increases between 875 and 1,225 mg/L <br />at Imperial Dam is now about $513,300 per mg/L per year. Under the CRWQIP, <br />an approach is being established to prioritize construction so that the <br />most cost-effective measures will be implemented to meet program goals; <br />Reclamation is attempting to determine which of the units of the CRWQIP <br />have the greatest potential for salt concentration reduction for the least <br />amount of money expended. For eval uat i on purposes, the incremental cost- <br />effectiveness of a potential salinity control measure is compared against <br />the cost-effectiveness of other poss i b 1 e control measures to determi ne <br />whether the specific measure should be implemented. <br /> <br />Figure 12 shows a breakout of the total average economic loss value of <br />$343,000 per mg/L per ye ar indexed up to $513,300 in 1982 do 11 ars . The <br />municipal and industrial sector carries most of the economic burden of <br />salinity increases in the Lower Basin. Moreover, regional indirect agri- <br />cultural losses to the economy are significantly larger than direct agri- <br />cultural losses accrued to the farmer in the Lower Basin. <br /> <br />Present cost allocation provisions under Public Law 93-320, the Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Act, state that the Federal Government will be <br />responsible for 75 percent of salinity control costs under Title II provi- <br />sions for the units authorized for construction. The remaining 25 percent <br />contribution will be derived from Upper and Lower Basin development fund <br />revenues. Other specific cost-sharing provisions for salinity control <br />projects are being developed. In a contract signed with water users in the <br />Grand Valley Unit area, operation and maintenance costs of governmental <br />funded lining to be installed in canal and laterals will be the responsi- <br />bility of the local beneficiaries and water users association. There are <br />other opportunities for cost-sharing programs in salinity control related <br />to water and energy resource development in the Basin. <br /> <br />Environmental Aspects <br /> <br />The CRWQIP is designed to serve the water quality improvement component of <br />the environmental quality objective which can be measured directly by eco- <br />nomi c effects on Basin water users. Although not all effects have been <br />determined or quantified, water quality improvement programs do extract a <br />"cost" of other natural resources in terms of land, water, solid wastes, <br />and energy consumption. <br /> <br />Investigations thus far have identified more than 8,500 acres of land that <br />may be directly affected by structural project features and brine evapora- <br />tion ponds. In the process of removing salt by structural barriers, <br />collection systems, desalting, or disposal ponds, over 120,000 acre-feet of <br />water per year may also be removed from the river system. Over 1 million <br />tons of salts per year may remain behind in long-term pond storage. <br />Extensive design efforts are underway to assure that salts and solid waste <br /> <br />20 <br />