Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~:...- <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />a Two of 14 eggs lost to predators, <br />b Four of 15 eggs lost to predators. <br />c Three eggs deserted after a snowstorm, one egg lost to a predator.. <br />d Examination of 10 eggs that did not hatch revealed that 4 were infertile, 2 contained <br />early-dead embryos, and 4 contained late-dead embryos, <br />e Poor hatchability of PWRC eggS-during the period 1976-1978 was due largely to egg <br />infertility (11 eggs) and artificial incubation (20 eggs), After 1978, only eggs containing <br />viable embryos (as determined by flotation) were t~ansferred and all eggs were incubated <br />under sandhill cranes at PWRC before their transfer. <br />f One egg lost to a predator before hatching. <br />9 Three eggs lost to predators before hatching. <br />h Three eggs believed to be infertile or to contain early dead embryos at the time of <br />transfer. <br />i Two eggs were eaten by predators and two failed to hatch. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The new pair remained together for over four months, Between 5 - 1 5 October, the male <br />was observed initiating migratory flights on five occasions with the female following, <br />However, the female was unable to keep up with the male and she always returned to the <br />territory with the male following, On October 15 the male migrated alone, The only other <br />whooper present, a wild male, immediately joined the female for 2 days until he migrated, <br /> <br />The female's history of six years in captivity appar~ntly rendered her phYSically incapable of <br />sustaining long flights, Attempts to capture her in late October were unsuccessful and she <br />disappeared, The behavior of the males at GL demonstrated that they were highly <br />responsive to the presence of a female during the ~reeding season, Observations indicated <br />that a long-term pair bond would probably have ocdurred had the female been able to fly <br />properly and completed the migration. ' <br /> <br />During the 1980's it became apparent that older females did not return to GL or other areas <br />occupied by territorial males during the summer, Experiments to enhance pair formation <br />were carried out from 1986 through 1990 whereby: 20 whooping cranes (some individuals <br />were recaptured several times>' were captured in isolated summer sites and released at GL <br />near male whooping cranes (Drewien and Clegg 19~2). Five (2 males, 3 females) were held <br />for one to four months in a pen prior to being released. Objectives of the experiment was to <br />, <br />enhance pair formation opportunities, Although the;se translocation experiments contributed <br />to numerous associations and interactions between,;ndividuals of both sexes, no permanent <br />pair bonds developed. The longest associations lasted two to four months before males and <br />females separated. These results suggested that imprinting problems possibly existed in <br />. whooping cranes raised by sandhill cranes. The females exhibited only minimal responses <br />to the presence of males, <br /> <br />From 1975 through 1988,289 eggs were transferrEld (including 73 eggs from the captive <br />flock at the PWRC), 210 hatched, and 85 chicks fledged (Drewien et al. 1989, Elliset ai, <br />1992), The RMP peaked at 33 birds in 1985 and has declined since then to 10 birds, Dr. <br />Edward 0, Garton, biometrician at the University of Idaho, working with Dr. Rod Drewien <br />the leader of the cross-fostering project (Garton et ai, 1989), modelled the cross-fostered <br />population to predict when it might become self-sustaining. In the model they assumed (1) <br />