My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05034
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:40 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:48:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - Bureau of Reclamation
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/1987
Author
BOR
Title
Monitoring and Evaluation of Salinity Control Projects - Interim Guide for the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~l.60 <br /> <br />necessary, the ponding test method is recommended for <br />use in measuring ditch seepage. When onfarm earthem <br />ditches are lined or replaced by pipe, seepage losses may <br />be estimated by assuming conveyance losses of 05 percent <br />per 1,000 linear feet for pipeline and 1 percent per 1,000 <br />linear feet for concrete lining, <br /> <br />should be made before planting and following harvest 01' at <br />the beginning and end of the growing season if the crop is <br />a perennial Soil moisture-holding capacity has been <br />generalized by soil texture by the U ,S. Department of <br />Agriculture and is available in soil survey reports for most <br />areas, <br /> <br />Onfarm Reduction of Deep Percolation <br />Onfarm deep percolation cannot be directly measured <br />under field conditions. However, it may be calculated <br />from irrigation delivery, drain flow, and irrigation,water <br />management data. The evaluation process requires data <br />on total inflow, outflow, crop evapotranspiration (ET), and <br />soil moisture, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Because outflow from large areas is not well correlated <br />with irrigation delivery, obtaining reliable estimates of <br />deep percolation is possible only at the farm or field level. <br />Therefore, farm or field monitoring sites should be estab- <br />lished on a representative sampling basis, and results <br />should be extrapolated to reflect conditions for the larger <br />area. Irrigation should be monitored throughout the <br />season. Soils tend to be more permeable after the winter <br />season and following cultivation, therefore, it is important <br />, that first irrigations following these events be monitored. <br /> <br />At the end nf tile irrigation season, water budgets should <br />be summarized by monitoring site and irrigation event. <br />The accumulation of irrigation events will become the an- <br />nual water budget for each site. The annual water budgets <br />for these sites can be classified according to soil type, <br />crop, method of irrigation, and existence of sa1inity-control <br />features. These characteristics are used to extrapolate <br />deep percolation estimates to unmonitored areas, <br /> <br />Total inflow is the sUm of natural precipitation on the field <br />and irrigation deliveries to the field. Precipitation can be <br />estimated using data from local climatological stations. <br />Distribution system inflow measurements usually are <br />available. However, the precision and frequency of <br />measurement progressively decreases from the canal diver- <br />sion to the lateral, sublateral, farm turnout, and the field. <br />Primary outflows other than deep percolation are taiIwater <br />runoff and drift loss. Tailwater runoff should be measured <br />directly, Drift loss can be estimated as a percentage of <br />delivery, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Off-farm Wildlife Habitat <br /> <br />Implementing salinity control projects may impact wildlife <br />habitat through: (1) disturbance or elimination due to con- <br />struction, (2) changes in ground-water or surface-water <br />regime, and (3) changes in salinity levels in the root zones, <br />For off-farm projects, monitoring of existing vegetation <br />and establishment of experimental vegetation plots can <br />provide data to assess impacts and management options. <br /> <br />To monitor existing vegetation, aerial imagery obtained for <br />the years preceding, during, and after project implementa- <br />tion can be used to determine changes in the extent of <br />vegetation types within the project area. False-color <br />infrared photography is usually preferred, because the <br /> <br />The difference between inflow and outflow is given as the <br />volume of water evaporating from the surface plus water <br />infIltrating into the soil. Deep percOlation is the amount <br />of infiltration in excess of the soil-moisture deficit, which is <br />defined as the water needed to bring soil moisture content <br />up to field capacity. The soil-moisture deficit can be deter- <br />mined by measuring soil moisture immediately before and <br />comparing it to the field capacity or it can be estimated by <br />calculating the crop ET since the previous irrigation. ET <br />is derived from climatological data collected and available <br />in many locations. If crop ET is used to determine the ~oil <br />moisture deficit, several field measurements of actual soil <br />moisture should be made during the irrigation season to <br />verify the calculations. Soil-moisture measurements <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.