Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3, Complete construction of primary refuges for the Green River Subbasin and the <br />Upper Colorado River Subbasin in FY 1996. <br /> <br />4. Construct or lease waters to be used as backup refuges for priority broodstocks or <br />captive-reared research fish to meet Recovery Program needs. <br /> <br />5. ModifY riverside ponds as growout ponds to rear endangered fish for stabilization or <br />reintroduction stocking. Past efforts have demonstrated that riverside ponds are highly <br />productive for rearing endangered fish but that there are problems with capturing fish <br />when they are needed by the Recovery Program. Many riverside ponds are not <br />drainable but water can be pumped out of them. Sloping the bottom of the ponds and <br />installing a catch basin (i.e., kettle or trap) will solve the problem of capturing fish <br />when the ponds are drained. <br /> <br />6. Use hatchery facilities for the initial rearing of the endangered fishes and transfer the <br />fish to growout ponds along the rivers when feasible. Harvest fish from the growout <br />ponds to conduct field experiments on survival of captive-reared fish after stocking into <br />Upper Basin rivers. <br /> <br />V. RESEARCH, MONITORING, & DATA MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />14 POPULATION SIZE/AGE STRUCTURE <br /> <br />This study is evaluating the size, age structure, distribution of the adult squawfish <br />population in the upper Colorado River for comparison with similar data collected IS <br />years ago. This will allow us to draw conclusions about population status and form a <br />baseline by which we can gauge progress of recovery efforts. A secondary goal of the <br />survey is to determine survival and distribution of hatchery-reared squawfish stocked in <br />the Colorado and Gunnison rivers during 1982-1984. This information will be <br />particularly useful in evaluating the usefulness of stocking in recovery. Both study <br />goals are being met. Large samples of adult Colorado squawfish were obtained <br />allowing for reliable size-frequency analysis as well as estimates of the peFCentage of <br />the population comprised of stocked individuals. Recapture rates were high (50%), <br />allowing for a fairly good confidence interval around a population point estimate of the <br />adult population above Westwater Canyon. Tbe data collection portion of this study <br />was completed in 1994. A draft report was due in January 1995 and a final report in <br />May 1995. Both due dates were not met because of a higher priority placed on a <br />concurrent report needed fOf an instream flow filing on the Colorado River. <br /> <br />Recommendations: We recommend that studies such as this one be fepeated <br />periodically in the Colorado River so tbat trends in population status can be more <br />accurately monitored. The overall population is small, making it more vulnerable to <br />extirpation than in the Green River Basin where squawfish are more numerous. To <br />calculate a population estimate, a minimum of three years of data collection is required; <br />to calculate a survival rate at least four years are required, The next four-year study <br />should probably commence after five years have lapsed since the end of this study. A <br /> <br />A-27 <br />