My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04999
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP04999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:47:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054
Description
Water Salvage
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
6/1/1975
Author
Utah Water Research
Title
Water Salvage Potentials in Utah - Volume II - Evaporation Suppression by Reservoir Destratification
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />nr:<;'O"3 <br />V.J...) -,' <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Reoean:b program obJoctlve <br /> <br />This is the second report of a project funded <br />by the State of Utah for the purpose of examining <br />water reuse and salvage potentials in Utah. The <br />objective of the overall research program is to <br />quantify the potential for extending and augment- <br />ing Utah's water supplies by such possibilities as <br />evaporation suppression and phreatophyte control. <br /> <br />The initial report (Volume I) included two <br />principal types of information: <br /> <br />I. An inventory of all bodies of water in the <br />state and an estimate of the average evap- <br />oration from each of them. <br /> <br />2. A model for estimating the potentia' for <br />evaporation suppression by the mono. <br />layer film concept and the results of appli- <br />cation of this model to all impoundments <br />in Utah. <br /> <br />The original intent of the project leader was to <br />devote approximately half of the 2-year project <br />effort to evaporation inventory and suppression <br />pOlential and the balance to phreatophyte inven- <br />tory and control. This plan was revised for the <br />following reasons: <br /> <br />I. During the latter part of the work on the <br />monolayer concept, the research team became <br />aware of a previously unresearched innovation in <br />evaporation suppression technology which might <br />have very important potential in Utah. The idea is <br />thermal mixing of impoundments as a means of <br />decreasing evaporation. <br /> <br />2. A significant amount of effort w~s devoted <br />to gathering the results of existing phreatophyte <br />acreage inventories for various basins in Utah. The <br />Utah Water Research Laboratory (UWRL) has <br />developed and published detailed water related <br />land use inventories for several Utah river basins, <br />but these are limited essentially to the north half of <br />the state. The UWRL phreatophyte classification <br />consists of four categories which are related to <br />consumptive use of water rather than identification <br />of the particular specie of plant. <br /> <br />The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) <br />com pleted a statewide inventory of phreatophytes <br />in Utah during 1974 in connection with the <br />Westwide Planning Program. This inventory <br />includes 10 categories which identify actual plant <br />species and in some cases depth to water table. <br />This type of inventory has desirable features in <br />regard to later use of the inventory for management <br />alternatives (which may differ according to plant <br />specie, not consumplion). The SCS inventory also <br />had the important advantage of essentially covering <br />the entire state. <br /> <br />Analysis of the unpublished SCS inventory <br />showed that it is quite detailed and accurate in <br />some areas such as the Sevier Basin where previous <br />detailed studies were the basis for the inventory. <br />However. in many basins the limited time and <br />funds available to this inventory required use of <br />judgment estimates of acreages by county person- <br />nel rather than identification of each specie on <br />aerie' photos and subsequent planimetering of the <br />acreages. <br /> <br />An attempt was made to reconcile the two <br />inventories in northern basin so that the UWRL <br />acreages could be converted to the SCS category <br />types. This resulted in an extremely difficult task <br />because of the different system of subbasin <br />boundaries used by lhe two agencies and because of <br />the obviously large discrepancies between the two <br />inventories caused by differences in phreatophyte <br />definitions and different methods of determining <br />acreages. <br /> <br />It became apparent that the most cost effective <br />use of the existing balance of project funds would <br />be to produce a thorough analysis of the <br />destratification concept potential and to delay the <br />phreatophyte control study until future funding at <br />an increased level can be made available to <br />continue the water salvage research program in this <br />important area. <br /> <br />Scope of this report <br /> <br />The objective of this report is to determine the <br />evaporation suppression potential of the destrati- <br />fication concept in Utah. This requires a <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.