Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 16. Continued. <br /> Reservoir Salvage Percent Cost <br /> Volume Volume Suppression ($/ Acre feet) <br />Basin Reservoir (Acre feet) (Acre feet) <br />10 Ash Creek 9928 77 13.9 32.75 <br />9 Lake Powell 27162000 152.264 31.2 .39 <br />8 Joe's Valley 62500 268 18.5 19.82 <br />10 Gunlock 10884 156 16.9 16.93 <br /> <br />4 Total with costs under $5 <br />Total with costs under S5 <br />5 Total with oosts of $5 to S10 <br />10 Total with costsofSlO 10$20 <br />10 Total with costs oC $20 to $40 <br /> <br />205.969 (seasonal model) <br />162.589 (long term model) <br />4.639 <br />3.185 <br />969 <br /> <br />There are 29 reservoirs in Utah (Table 16) <br />which have the potential for water salvage at costs <br />under $40 per acre foot (1970 dollars); 19 reservoirs <br />under $20; 9 reservoirs under $10 and 4 reservoirs <br />under $5. The major quantity of salvage would be <br />in the under $5 category because it includes the <br />major reservoirs. Powell. Flaming Gorge. Bear <br />Lake and Strawberry. Bear Lake. or course is <br />deleted in the long term analysis because its <br />suppression would be only temporary, as discussed <br />previously. The regression equation for costs <br />indicates very large economies of scale for Lake <br />Powell ($0.39 cost per acre foot). An extrapolation <br />this far out of the empirical da:a range is probably <br />not accurale and a cost of $1 to $2 would likely be <br />more reasonable for Lake Powell. Since Powell <br />represents the major potential in the state, a more <br />detailed discussion of the probable costs and <br />benefits of destralifying Lake Powell is given in a <br />separate section. <br /> <br />The flaming Gorge cost of $1.51 is ;;"ely also <br />too low because of a significant extrapolation. The <br />volume of flaming Gorge is 3.8 million acre feet <br />while the largest impountment included in deriving <br />the cost function was 0.5 million acre feet. <br />Strawberry reservoir at 0.87 million acre feet <br />represents only a slight extrapolation and is <br />computed al $2.81. It is likely that a reasonable <br />cost to expect on flaming Gorge is $2.00 to $2.50. <br /> <br />Several smaller reservoirs have costs which <br />would likely make destratification cost effective. <br />The five reservoirs with costs between $5 and $10 <br />are Pineview, Deer Creek, Starvation. Sevier, and <br />Mona. In the Weber Basin there is a current <br />surplus of water making the $7.37 cosl at Pineview <br />of questionable feasibility; however, $8 to $10 costs <br /> <br />in the two Sevier Basin reservoirs should be lower <br />than the marginal cost of water there. There are <br />several other reservoirs included in Table 16 which <br />have costs which appear to be lower than the value <br />of the water salvaged. for example, the value of <br />water in the Virgin River Basin is undoubtedly <br />higher than the $17 cost at Gunlock Reservoir and <br />probably also higher than the $33 at Ash Creek. <br />Several of the $10 to $20 costs are at reservoirs in <br />the Weber and Bear River Basins. The marginal <br />value of irrigation water in both of these basins is <br />presently less that $20 and probably less than SIO <br />at most reservoirs. <br /> <br />Lake PoweU cost effecdveness <br /> <br />As discussed previously, a reasonable cost of <br />salvaged water at Lake Powell appears to be $1 to <br />$2 per acre foot. Using the higher figure, the cost of <br />salvaging 140,000 acre feet annually would be <br />$280,000. If this water is worth $10 per acre foot, <br />the net profit of such an operation would be <br />$1,120,000 per year. <br /> <br />Since destratification of Lake Powell would <br />require a large amount of energy. an interesting <br />aspect of such a project is the impact on the energy <br />supply/demand quantities of this area. Extrapola- <br />lion of the energy demand curve given in the <br />Symons report (1971) suggests that compressors or <br />pumps totaling 3200 H.P. would be required to <br />destratify Lake Powell. Because of uncertainties in <br />such an extrapolalion, 6,000 H.P. will be used in <br />the following analysis as a conservative estimate of <br />the energy requirement. The annual model for <br />Lake Powell indicates thaI 6 months of continuous <br />pumping would be required for optimum results. <br /> <br />46 <br />