Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />f. Impoundment Destratification for Raw <br />Water Quality Control Using Either Me- <br />chanical or Diffused-Air Pumping. <br /> <br />g. Influence of Artificial Destratification on <br />Plankton Populations in Impoundments. <br /> <br />h. Control of Reservoir Water Quality by <br />Engineering Methods. <br /> <br />An extensive bibliography on "Artificial <br />Destratification" is given following lhese papers. <br /> <br />Another publication which is related to the <br />Public Health Service project is a state of the art <br />paper by Symons and others (I 969) which <br />summarizes and adds. to the previously cited <br />information. This paper discusses destratification <br />results on a few lakes and describes a suggested <br />methodology for estimating the capacity of <br />equipment required for destratification. The <br />second method discussed (the DE method), is <br />based upon calculating the theoretical minimum <br />amount of energy required to destroy a thermocline <br />(the stability) and multiplying this by a factor <br />which was required on previous field trials. This <br />method appears to be suitable for destratification <br />for evaporation studies. The results reported indi- <br />cate a DE (destratification efficiency = theoretical <br />minimum/ actual energy) varying from 0.2 to 1.5 <br />percent by diffused air, depending on the season. <br />The authors recommend a design DE of 0.5 <br />percent for the diffused air method and 0.1 percent <br /> <br />for mechanical pumping of water. This indicates a <br />much better efficiency for the diffused air method <br />than for mechanical pumping of water on the reser- <br />voirs studied (which were only 40 to 60 feet deep). <br />Figure 4 shows the pattern of circulation which is <br />achieved during a destratification operation. <br /> <br />An American Water Works Association <br />Committee. also chaired by Symons, has gathered <br />and summarized the results of a survey of 33 water <br />suppliers who have destratified their reservoirs. <br />The responses from 29 of these reservoir operators <br />have been reproduced by the committee (A WW A, <br />1971) and summarized as a Committee Report <br />(Symons. Committee Report, 1971). This report <br />was particularly useful in this research because of <br />its cost and energy requirement data which will be <br />discussed later. <br /> <br />The agencies responding to this survey were <br />mostly in the U.S. but included two foreign <br />reservoirs. The purposes of destratification <br />included taste and order control (45 percent), <br />increasing dissolved oxygen (37 percent) and <br />various other mineral and algal control purposes. <br />The methods of destratification included six <br />different categories but all involved pumping of <br />either air or water and the predominant method <br />was air (55 percent Diffused Air and 33 percent <br />Commercial Air-Aqua System). Most of the energy <br />sources were electrical (83 percent) with various <br />fossil fuels making up the balance. <br /> <br />'1 <br /> <br />PUMP <br />DISCHARGE~AFT <br /> <br />, , ~ ,"-- '-~';/ ~rno/~" <br />....>+L~;II "~"";:'){" <br />.," ."Y\""'-_~'" ~,:....:': -0.'.-.,',., <br />-.'-,' <br />. . , - <br /> <br />. . <br />CUR!:l~T 9.F'.CI~~ <br />." " ". ,,' " .to. ',"', ',-" ".:> ", ,\ <br /> <br /> <br />-r "_. <br /> <br />'," <br /> <br />:::; <br /> <br />"c. . :t: ':~j~;~l <br /> <br />'". "-"; '~'. <br /> <br />, . <br />:.~.\.i>,} <br />~':h ':.i'~, <br /> <br />.-.,' <br /> <br />Figure 4. General deotratIflcaUon ocbeme (after Symons, 1969). <br /> <br />6 <br />