Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />One congressman took to the Congressional Record and called the <br />statements of project opponents "false and malicious propaganda" in <br />leading people to believe that the river ride was safe and follow~ <br />up with the complaints of a California couple on the extreme hazards <br />and dangers that they faced. (51) <br /> <br />While some accounts referred to such trips as flirtations with <br />suicide and others spoke of wonderous thrills, the Sierra Club or- <br />ganized. several rafting trips to better acquaint people with the <br />project site. Actually, David R. Brower, executive director of <br />the Sierra Club and a leader in the opposition to Echo Park described <br />to a Senate COmmittee in 1954, the potential of river running through <br />the project area: "With good business administration, an expanded <br />boat concession ,in Dinosaur probably has a potential something like <br />this...twenty campsites would be occupied each night, and about that <br />many trucks and buses would be busy shuttling boats and people to <br />the starting points. About 70,000 persons could thus see parts of <br />Dinosaur from the river each summer season, perhaps spending about <br />$10 per day for transportation and meals on the river..."(52) <br /> <br />However, Brower's vision of the use of rafting through the Dino- <br />saur National Park area was not to be. What a dam and fear could not <br />do to river rafting potential, National Park Service regulations <br />did. Rafting through Dinosaur 1S severely limited and regulated. <br />Campsites are assigned and permits are required. Regulations pro- <br />hibit the same person from rafting down the river twice in one season <br />and park rangers cite rafters who don't wear life jackets and who <br />attempt to run the river without a permit. Although substantially <br />more applications for permits are received, the number of persons <br />that can raft the rivers through Dinosaur is limited to about 15,000 <br />to 17,000 (53) people per year, a number substantially lower than <br />the 70,000 envisioned by Brower in 1954. <br /> <br />ECHO <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />ECHO <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />ECHO <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />ECHO <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />ECHO <br /> <br />Following the lead of General U. S. Grant III, opponents to <br />Echo Park and Split Mountain Reservoirs quickly seized upon the <br />theme of alternate dam sites, most prominent of which was Cross <br />Mountain. <br /> <br />Grant was an engineer in the Army Corp of Engineers and later <br />retired to become president of the American Planning and Civic As- <br />sociation. He did a study on optional alternatives and his conclu- <br />sions were used and reused by several environmental organizations. <br />Although his studies were elaborate, Grant summed up his position in <br />Congressional testimony by saying "I recommend omission from this <br />list and from further consideration the Echo Park Reservoir and <br />bringing forward from second to first priority the Gray Canyon and <br />Cross Mountain reservoirs." (54) <br /> <br />The Cross Mountain Reservoir of that time period, had the dam <br />-10- <br />