Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Q V 2 Q V2 <br />Y. +Z +...LL:y' +z +...LL.+h <br />222g 112g e <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the rod where the water was too deep to wade, Channel substrate, feature, and habitat <br />type were communicated by radio to the total station operator where it was recorded <br />with the total station coordinates using a HP48GX, with TDS48 software. <br /> <br />Water-surface elevation and velocity were recorded at random points within each <br />reach for use in calibrating the two-dimensional model. Velocities were measured at 0,6 <br />ft depth, to represent average column velocity, using a Marsh-McBirney current meter. <br />A staff stage was installed at both sites and a stage-discharge relationship was <br />determined by taking flow readings several times throughout the summer. <br /> <br />Topographic data collected over the summer were input into the Arelnfo <br />software package to create a Triangular Irregular Network (TIN) surface model of the <br />channel. By mapping the topographic points on the TIN it was possible to determine <br />where additional survey points were needed in order to accurately represent channel <br />topography. Aerial photographs were taken of the sites at a scale of 1 inch equals 600 <br />feet on September 15, at which time the flow was 287 cfs on the Maybell gauge. The <br />aerial photos were qualitatively used to determine how representative the study reach <br />compared to reaches up and down stream. Additionally, images of the site were <br />rectified using ground control points and the Imagine software package. These images <br />were then registered in the Surface-Water Modeling Software (SMS) and were used for <br />reference in creating the finite element mesh. <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC SIMULATION <br /> <br />Hydraulic simulation and 2-D flow modeling was contracted with the Earth <br />Resources Depart.ment of Colorado State University (CSU). Greg Stewart, a graduate <br />student at CSU, collected, input the data for hydraulic modeling and performed the <br />analysis. Many attempts were made to run the 2-D model during the first year of this <br />contract but unfortunately, at the time of this writing, RMA2 analysis has only been <br />partially completed and no two-dimensional modeling results are available. <br /> <br />HEC-RAS is a I-D hydraulic flow model created by the Hydrologic Engineering <br />Center of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Brunner, 1998), and is based on solution <br />of the one-dimensional energy equation (1). <br /> <br />where: hY2 = <br />2),22 = <br />VI.V2 = <br /> <br />a},Q] <br />g <br />h. <br /> <br />depth of water at cross sections <br />elevation at cross sections <br />average velocities (total discharge/total flow area) <br />= velocity weighting coefficients <br />= gravitational acceleration <br />= energy head loss <br /> <br />6 <br />