My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04972
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:46:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8509
Description
San Luis Valley
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
9/26/1974
Title
Garcia Water Problems
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />(0 <br />lO <br />CJ <br />(.~:J <br />j""". <br />",-", <br /> <br />the Eastdale reservoir system into costilla Reservoir. The Water <br />Company filed an injunction suit in the U. S. District Court for <br />New Mexico, but a motion to dismiss by the New Mexico state Engineer <br />was granted. The company appealed to the U. S. Circuit Court of <br />Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and the court suggested that the way <br />to solve the problem was through interstate compact. <br /> <br />The costilla Creek Compact was negotiated by representa- <br />tives of the Colorado Water Conservation Board, the New Mexico state <br />Engineer, and the Water Company during 1941-44 and became effective <br />on June II, 1946. The compact apportions both direct flow and <br />storage waters between the two states. concepts built into the <br />compact that have the major impact are: 1) direct flow water is <br />apportioned between irrigators of the two states on a priority <br />basis; 2) Colorado direct flow decrees were reduced one-half to <br />allow for the difference in decreed duties of 1 cfs per 80 acres in <br />New Mexico and 1 cfs per 40 acres in Colorado, except no decree was <br />reduced to less than 1 cfs; 3) changes of points of diversion for <br />company-owned rights in the Acequia Madre and in the Manzanares and <br />Madriles Ditches were recognized; 4) storage in costilla Reservoir <br />was apportioned between the two states; and 5) storage in the <br />Eastdale reservoir system from costilla Creek was limited to 1,000 <br />acre-feet annually. In 1963, the costilla Creek Compact was amended <br />to allow transfer of an additional portion of the Acequia Madre <br />water right to the Cerro Canal. Attachment 3 is the amended compact <br />delivery schedule for Colorado direct flow water, and the allocations <br />shown for delivery to the creek correspond to the original Colorado <br />direct flow decrees for the Acequiacita and for the Chalifu, <br />Trujillo, and Garcia Ditches. <br /> <br />In 1956, the Water Company disposed of its water rights. <br />The Colorado portion of the costilla Reservoir project and Cerro <br />Canal was acquired by the Jaroso Mutual Ditch Association, while <br />the New Mexico portion was acquired by the Rio costilla Cooperative <br />Livestock Association. The Eastdale Mutual Ditch and Reservoir <br />Company acquired the Eastdale reservoir system and the right to <br />store 1,000 acre-feet of water from costilla Creek. The Sanchez <br />Ditch and Reservoir Company acquired Sanchez Reservoir and all the <br />company's Culebra Creek water rights including the Culebra-Eastdale <br />Canal. This is the ownership of the water rights at the present. <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.