Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A ttachment A <br /> <br />Hydrology <br /> <br />This analysis was done to evaluate proposed flow recommendations (Flow Recommendations <br />for the San Juan River [Flow Recommendations]) (Holden, 1999) of the San Juan River <br />Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRBRlP), Operating criteria for Navajo Dam <br />were developed to demonstrate how the dam might be operated to meet the Flow <br />Recommendations. These suggested criteria determine the timing and size of release flows <br />to maximize the ability of the river to meet the Flow Recommendations, These proposed <br />criteria could reduce releases from Navajo Reservoir to 250 cubic feet per second (cfs) for a <br />portion of time during the non-spring runoff period when fish releases or flood control <br />releases are not being made, This analysis addresses hydrologic impacts that may affect water <br />diverters in the San Juan River from Navajo Dam to the Animas River confluence under these <br />low-flow conditions. Impacts to the trout fishery and the riparian environment are addressed <br />in other sections, <br /> <br />In a 6-day test, July 9,2001 through July 15, 2001 (Summer Low Flow Test [Test]), average <br />releases from Navajo Dam were reduced from a previous rate of approximately 500 cfs to a <br />target minimum of approximately 250 cfs. All releases during the test were made through the <br />Navajo Hydroelectric Plant via the Navajo Dam main outlet works penstock, Release criteria <br />for the Test included flows as low as 250 cfs at Navajo Darn, provided that a minimum flow <br />of 500 cfs was maintained in the San Juan River in the critical habitat area. During the Test, <br />six Geological Survey (GS) river gauging stations were monitored to ensure the 500 cfs <br />minimum flow was not violated. The minimum flow recorded in the recovery area was <br />609 cfs at Shiprock on July 15. Daily flow data from the six gauging stations are shown in <br />table 1. Flow rates shown are mean daily values and are provisional data only, Figure 1 is a <br />graph of the data in table I. <br /> <br />To evaluate impacts between the San Juan River GS gauge at Archuleta and the Animas River <br />confluence, flow measurements were collected over a three-day period, July 10-12, The <br />San Juan River, canal diversions from the river, canal flow at various points along the canal, <br />and canal wasteways were measured, When necessary, flow data were collected through <br />interviews with water usets, All flow measurements, reported flow, and observed or <br />estimated flows are summarized in table 2. Data types are station number, station name, <br />description, river mile, flow measurements, average of the measured flow, and field personnel <br />(who performed measurements) and are arrayed by rivers, canals, personal contacts and <br />observations, and Hammond Data Sheets, Maps 1 and 2 show the location of measurement <br />points and irrigated areas. Table 3 summarizes inigated acres by canal subset by return flow <br />points that coincide with river measurement locations, <br /> <br />Summer Low Flow Test Report. April 2002 <br /> <br />A-l <br />00605 <br />