Laserfiche WebLink
<br />15 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Archeological investigations have been conducted. A copy ofthe State Historical <br />Preservation Officer clearance of the archeological investigation is include in Appendix F. <br />There are no archeologically significant sites that will be impacted by the development of <br />the Tamarack Plan on TRSW A or PESW A. The archeological survey did not include sites <br />within the 100 year floodplain because these sites were deemed to have been previously <br />disturbed. There are 24 well sites and approximately 2.49 miles of pipeline located within <br />the 100 year floodplain. <br /> <br />LAND USE <br /> <br />The project is consistent with the current and future management plans of both SW As. <br />Unique Farmland investigations have been conducted. A copy ofthe NRCS clearance for <br />prime and unique farmlands is included in Appelldix D. There are no unique or Prime <br />farmlands that will be impacted by the developm~nt of the Tamarack Plan on TRSW A or <br />PESW A. <br /> <br />FLOOD PLAINS AND WETLANDS <br /> <br />Temporary benning at the well construction sites will create a potential reduction in the <br />floodplain width near the well sites of approximately 100 feet which represents less than <br />1 % impact to the floodplain width. This temporary impact is deemed a negligible impact <br />on the floodplain function. <br /> <br />There will be some impact to the wetlands on the PESW A by the construction of a pipeline <br />from the proposed well to the proposed recharge pond. The COE office determined that <br />the proposed pipeline construction could be authorized pursuant the Department of the <br />Army Nationwide Permit No. 18. See Appendix E. <br /> <br />VI. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION <br /> <br />Jon Altenhofen, with the SPLRG, provided project maps. <br /> <br />Terry McKee, with the Army Corp of Engineers, reviewed project sites for wetland issues <br />and clearances for 404 permit. <br /> <br />Dawn Jackson and Cynthia Gilmore, from the Sterling and Sedgwick County NRCS offices <br />respectively, reviewed project sites for unique and' prime farmland clearances. <br />Janice McKee, with the USFWS was consulted regarding T&E species. <br />