Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />compact for the states to ratify, followed by congressional approval of the <br />compact was, for Carpenter, the preferred modus operandi. <br />Carpenter's arguments in support of the constitutionality of interstate <br />compacts focused on the preservation of state sovereignty. His reasoning <br />resulted not only from the training he received as an attorney and his interest <br />in constitutional history but from his frustrating experiences with Royce <br />Tipton in the San Luis Valley. Colorado's legitimate irrigation projects along <br />the Rio Grande were prohibited because of the federal government's concern <br />about meeting treaty obligations with Mexico. <br />In 1896 the United States and Mexico began discussions respecting the <br />use of water of the Rio Grande at EI Paso. As a result of these conversations, <br />the Secretary of State recommended that the Secretary of the Interior "suspend <br />operation of the act of 1891 known as 'the right-of-way act,' under which <br />easements must be secured for the construction of irrigation works over public <br />lands. . . . In harmony with this recommendation the Secretary of the Interior <br />entered what was known as 'the embargo order,' whereby the Commissioner <br />General of the Land Office was directed to approve no more filings under the <br />act of 189 I until further orders." As Carpenter noted in hearings before the <br />United States Senate in 1925,8 "[t]he effect of that order was just as though an <br />army had been placed in that territory to prevent construction activities. No <br />building was allowed." Following a treaty with Mexico in 1906, the order was <br />modified allowing reservoir construction, but all projects commenced after <br />I 903 remained embargoed. In its "bureaucratic spirit of super caution," <br />Carpenter concluded, the Department of the Interior declined to lift the <br />embargo until I 925, even though "scientific investigations" and "engineering <br />studies" showed that the waters of the Rio Grande were ample to supply the <br />needs of both the United States and Mexico and that, indeed, surplus water <br />