My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04958
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:46:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1997
Author
Daniel Tyler
Title
Delpheus Emory Carpenter and the Colorado River Compact of 1922
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />Colorado River within the United States of America to the Republic of <br />Mexico. . . in fulfillment of any obligation. . . by treaty between the <br />two nations, shall be equally apportioned between and equally borne by <br />the Upper Division and the Lower Division of the Colorado River. . . .71 <br />This was the same position he defended in Santa Fe in November. Nothing <br />was said about surplus water. Half of the Mexican burden would be <br />contributed by each basin and the Lower Basin would make up its <br />contribution to Mexico from waters originating in its own geographical area <br />and from waters passed through Lee's Ferry by the Upper Basin. The <br />responsibility of making the actual delivery to Mexico, according to the terms <br />of the treaty, would fall to the Lower Basin. <br />As discussions advanced in Santa Fe regarding the quantity of water the <br />Upper Basin could guarantee to the Lower Basin on an annual basis, the <br />subject of the Mexican burden resurfaced as a possible negotiating point. <br />Carpenter made it clear that the Upper Basin could not alone accept the <br />responsibility of satisfYing treaty obligations to Mexico.72 As stated in the <br />signed Compact, he finally persuaded the Commission to agree that if "as a <br />matter of international comity" the United States were to recognize Mexico's <br />right to any Colorado River water, that burden would be satisfied from surplus <br />waters. Should this source prove insufficient, the burden would then be borne <br />equally by both basins.73 <br />After the Compact was signed and after Los Angeles had announced its <br />intention of building an aqueduct from the Colorado River to the city, <br />Carpenter criticized California's behavior. In ] 926 he argued that the Mexican <br />burden "naturally [fell] upon the three lower states" and that <br />one million acre-feet of water pumped over the hill to Los Angeles is a <br />serious burden upon the river in view of the fact that any international <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.