My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04917
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:45:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.D
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/4/1998
Author
GCMRC
Title
Draft Adaptive Contingency Flow Alternatives for Water Year 1999
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />In summer 1998, both Lake Powell and Lake Mead filled, and Glen Canyon and Hoover dams <br />operated at near full pool stages, In addition to present reservoir conditions, long-range climate <br />forecasts indicate that precipitation in the Colorado River basin may be at or above normal levels <br />during 1999. Because of the increased likelihood that Water Year 1999 will produce at or above <br />normal runoff into nearly full reservoirs (surplus conditions), the possibility exists that flows <br />from GCD may exceed 25,000 cfs in 1999. The Secretary of the Interior's (Secretary) direction <br />and the Record of Decision (ROD, October 1996) prohibit fluctuating hydropower plant releases <br />from Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) under flows ~25,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). Flows above <br />this level can be used to avert emergency situations, anticipated spillsl, or to accommodate high <br />forecasted inflows; however, such flows are to be steady, not fluctuating, releases. <br /> <br />In spring 1996, an experimental Beach/Habitat-building Flow (BHBF) from GCD was initially <br />tested. The BHBF consisted of a controlled constant release from GCD of 45,000 cfs for seven <br />days during late March and early April. This level of flow was achieved through a combination <br />of releases from the powerplant and bypass jet tubes. NeitheT of the two spillways at GCD were <br />used during the BHBF. <br /> <br />.~ <br />> <br /> <br />!~- <br /> <br />$, <br /> <br />~ <br />, <br />'. <br />.~ <br />." <br /> <br />The initial BHBF was conducted as an experiment to study planned flooding as a management <br />tool for restoration and preservation of Colorado River ecosystem resources. The primary goals <br />of the experimental flood were to learn about sediment transport under high flows and to <br />mobilize and redeposit channel-stored sand as higher-elevation bars. Additiooal objectives <br />included preservation of cultural resources, providing more natural flood-disturbance processes <br />to Tiparian vegetation, rejuvenation of other important channel features such as backwater <br />habitats, and flushing non-native fishes from critical areas in downstream reaches. Of the eight <br />objectives generally listed in the GCD Environmental Impact Statement (GCD-EIS), the BHBF <br />achieved five that were mostly related to sediment transport and deposition. Subsequent releases <br />from GCD dUTing Water Years 1997 and 1998 have eroded sandbars and redistributed sand back <br />into eddies. Exceptional sediment inputs from the Paria River occurred in the summers of both <br />1997 and 1998, and sediment supplies appear to be acceptable for another BHBF. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />'. <br />" <br /> <br />:'to <br /> <br />;'. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />r.: <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />,', <br />,', <br />:"" <br />" <br />~i>. <br />If <br /> <br />The goal of adaptively managing the Colorado River is to use the best scientific information to <br />plan and accomplish preservation and enhancement of Colorado River ecosystem resources, and <br />to mitigate the undesirable impacts of GCD releases on those resources. Because releases from <br />Lake Powell above 25,000 cfs may be required in Water Year 1998 as the result of high runoff, <br />early planning efforts aimed at preparing fOT managing these flows are recommended. <br />Guidelines have been developed through the Adaptive Management Program (AMP) and under <br />the Grand Canyon Protection Act (GCPA), GCD-EIS and ROD for formulating daily flow <br />regimes for GCD. The AMP includes the Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG), the <br /> <br />:.~ <br />r~ <br />>, <br />,. <br />ill' <br />o;~ <br />'It <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />, ~~ <br />t; <br />~: <br />,i <br /> <br />I A spill is defined as any dam release in excess of power plant capacity (33,200 cfs), <br /> <br />[WORKING DRAFT 2 . GCMRC: 12/04/98] 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.