Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002525 <br /> <br />Forest Planning <br /> <br />A land and resource management plan guides management activities on NFS lands. It <br />contains directions on how and where different types of activities can occur. It also <br />provides guidance on how to implement and monitor the effectiveness of the Plan. <br /> <br />The DE IS contains an analysis of a number of different ways to implement the Forest <br />Plan. These different ways to implement the Plan are called alternatives. The DEIS <br />contains six alternatives. Each of these alternatives can be considered to be a separate <br />and complete forest plan. Alternative D, the Preferred Alternative, represents the <br />Forest's choice of the most appropriate way to manage the White River National Forest. <br /> <br />We have been implementing the existing Forest Plan since it was approved in 1984. <br />Monitoring of the existing Plan showed that there were several reasons to update or <br />revise it. These reasons include new laws and policies, better data and information <br />systems, changing uses, and new issues and public concerns. We began wor\< on <br />revising the existing Forest Plan several years ago. <br /> <br />Many laws and policies guide national forest management. Some of the more familiar <br />ones include the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) and the National <br />Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NFMA requires that NFS lands be managed for a <br />variety of uses on a sustained basis to ensure a continued supply of goods and services <br />to the American people. NEPA ensures that environmental information is made available <br />to public officials and citizens before decisions are made and before actions are taken. <br /> <br />The DEIS was prepared according to NEPA regulations. It displays the alternatives <br />considered for implementing the Forest Plan and the environmental consequences each <br />alternative will have. <br /> <br />In addition to existing guidance, new policies and laws needed to be incorporated into <br />the revised Forest Plan. In 1993, Congress passed the Government Performance and <br />Results Act (GPRA), which strives to increase the accountability of federal agencies by <br />measuring progress toward achievement of agency goals and objectives. This <br />legislation, applicable to all federal agencies, requires the preparation of periodic <br />strategic and annual performance plans that are focused on outcomes and results. <br /> <br />To implement GPRA, the Forest Service issued a strategic plan in 1997. It centers on <br />three main goals that apply to the management of all NFS lands: <br /> <br />. ensure sustainable ecosystems <br />. provide multiple benefits for people within the capabilities of ecosystems <br />. ensure organizational effectiveness. <br /> <br />The revised Forest Plan will focus on these goals. In addition, the Forest Service has <br />been directed to manage the Forest using an ecological approach. Together, these laws <br />and policies helped shape the draft planning documents. <br /> <br />-- 5 -- <br />