<br />, .
<br />2M
<br />
<br />.'.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />, .
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />THE
<br />DENVER
<br />POST
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />WlI~ Dean SlneJeton.
<br />Chafnnan "'the ao.rd
<br />Ol;Jha1d F. Hunt, Publl8her
<br />F. Gilman Spencer, Edltol'
<br />Chuck Green. EditcrlaI Page EdItor
<br />Gay COOk, M~ Editor
<br />William H. Hornby, SMIor EdifJol'
<br />
<br />'7bere is no hOpe for thesatlsfJed man'. II'.G. Bonro., PublIsher, 188&-1933
<br />
<br />.
<br />,
<br />,- Rethinking ~s~l:; Plata
<br />
<br />TF' TIlE ONLY p.."..e of the
<br />.l.AJdmaa..La Plata water project
<br />were to irrigate land so farmers
<br />In southwestern Colorado could
<br />grow more surplus crops, it
<br />, would be hard to Jualify.
<br />, But since the $600 million
<br />scheme also would setUe a long-
<br />Btandiog dispute over Indian wa~
<br />ter rlghta, it's become poliUcally
<br />palatable. Indeed, BOme mem~
<br />ben of Congreu - who might
<br />aorm.alJy decry such a deal as an
<br />enormous boondoggle - bave
<br />gI... U hearty supporL
<br />Th... lbe DOll.. that the proj-
<br />ect n:aay bave to be sculUed as a
<br />threat to ao ..daogered speci..
<br />bas caused some otherwise
<br />thoaghUul leaders to holler,
<br />''DaQin the squaw/Ish! Full speed
<br />ahead("
<br />~ It must be admitted that In an
<br />. earUer I Iesa-enligbtened age, the.
<br />federal government tried to ex-
<br />termJnate a8 "trub fish" the
<br />lIDIque aquatic creature It's now
<br />legally obliged to protect. But
<br />thla ls no reason to repudiate the
<br />_gored Specl.. Act, as1nle-
<br />rior Seeietary Manuel Lujan sog-
<br />geslod this week.
<br />In practice. the 17-year-old law
<br />bas aerved more as a cauUonary
<br />Dag than a red light to develop-
<br />menl Besides, It's a little early to
<br />beglo. reneging on the environ-
<br />< meDtal commitments the Ameri-
<br />can people so fervenUy renewed
<br />on tIie 20th anoiveraary of -Earth
<br />Day laal month.
<br />NtlW that Antmas-La Plata baa
<br />been put on bold by the U.s. FIsh
<br />and WUdlUe Service, the propo-
<br />nen18 shoold be tooklng at alter-
<br />naU1feS, not trying to atifle fur~
<br />tber scientific studies. They
<br />might well find a way to meet the
<br />.oalloo" obUgaUons to the 1ndlan
<br />IrIbelllllbonl ..using ecological
<br />barnJ. - and costing the federal
<br />gttVtn1mlent needless m1ll1ons on
<br />tbetdde.
<br />Ol1e option would be to scale
<br />dowo the project, whlch was orig-
<br />lnaUy designed to provide more
<br />raw water each year than the
<br />- DOW--diJcredited Two Forts Dam
<br />IOUthwest of Denver. A smaller
<br />vera10n would require the diver-
<br />Bloo of less water from tbe Ani-
<br />maa River Into the La Plata
<br />drainage. Hence it would d1mln-
<br />isb the Impact of reduced river
<br />flows OD the few dozen native
<br />IQWlwfish that sUllsurvive in the
<br />San Juan River about 100 miles
<br />downstream.
<br />III addition, leaving more wa-
<br />ter in the channel would sustain a
<br />gro1ring river:rafUng industry
<br />aDd help to keep salinity levels in
<br />eheok, lb.. lessening lbe need lor
<br />expensive measures to control
<br />this form of pollution in the Colo-
<br />rado River system even farther
<br />dowmtream. '
<br />Another approacb rnlgI1t be to
<br />,~elve the project entirely and
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />,
<br />
<br />.
<br />;
<br />t
<br />,
<br />,
<br />
<br />,.
<br />.
<br />"
<br />,
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />
<br />[
<br />,
<br />
<br />,
<br />,.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />seek other sources of water to
<br />meet historical obligations to the
<br />indians - who don't wholeheart-
<br />edly support the plans in any
<br />case, as the recent recall elecllon
<br />on the Southern Ute reservation
<br />clearly showed.
<br />Under the current proposal, In~
<br />dian fanners would receive only
<br />about lS percent of the water
<br />from Animas-La Plata anyway.
<br />Tbe remaining yield would be
<br />used to irrigate some 85 &quare
<br />miles owned by non-Indians.
<br />Moreover, many of the potential
<br />customers might well find the
<br />water unaflordable, given blgb
<br />pumping costs and low prices for
<br />the hay, grain and vegetables
<br />that presumably would be groWl!
<br />wllblt.
<br />The Ute Mountain Ute reaerva~
<br />tlon, which adjoins Mesa Verde
<br />National Park On the weat and
<br />south, probably could be ade~
<br />quately supplied with water
<br />piped from the recently complet-
<br />ed McPhee Reservoir north of
<br />Cortez. The Southern Utes, wh()
<br />live farther east, might satisfy
<br />their needs with welm, small di~
<br />versions and aUocaUona from ex-
<br />latina projects sucb as Valleclto
<br />Reservoir northeast of Durango.
<br />It's important to note, too, that
<br />while the Indians may bold senior
<br />water rights, their real long-term
<br />interest may not lie in exploiting
<br />the resource themselves, bat in
<br />selling or leasing their water to
<br />other users - primarily the
<br />thirsty inhabitants of Las Vegas,
<br />San Diego and other growing
<br />markets in the southwest.
<br />The water destined for Bach
<br />downstream cities could be
<br />stored in existiog projects like
<br />the Navajo Reservoir, which
<br />haSD't yet been fully allocated.
<br />ADd the revenue received for It
<br />could be used to address the
<br />tribes' health, education and 0th-
<br />er social needs, as well as to su~
<br />port various economle-deve1o~
<br />ment enterpriaea.
<br />The Colorado water establish-
<br />ment strongly opposes such ez-
<br />ports as a threat to potential fu-
<br />ture development within the
<br />state. However, the concept of in-
<br />terstate transfers - OIlng the
<br />river system itself as a conduit
<br />- is aUracUDg Increasing inter-
<br />f!st among professional water
<br />planners.
<br />In short. what appears to be a
<br />setback on.ft~nJmaB-La Plata
<br />could well tlltD out to be a rare
<br />opportunity .to re-examine some
<br />economic assUmptions that may
<br />not be valid anymore.
<br />Neither the Indian tribes nor
<br />the taxpayers would necesaarily
<br />be wel1...rvedby .pendlng bun-
<br />dreds of mlIllona of dollars on a
<br />problem. that might be solvoo.
<br />more cheaply, and with fewer ad-
<br />verse consequences, in a leas-tra.
<br />ditional manner.
<br />
|