Laserfiche WebLink
<br />United States <br />General Accounting omce <br />Washington, D.C. 20548 <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />~'\ <br />t~1 <br />I' <br />~~; <br />;e <br />~;I <br />.. <br />~~I <br />~; <br />.,' <br />OC'~ <br /> <br />GAO <br /> <br />Resources, Conunumdty, and <br />Economic Development Division <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />JAN 0 8 1996 <br /> <br />B-260541 <br /> <br />November 17, 1995 <br /> <br />('QI.::.-dw.-Water <br />Col_lIalion Boam <br /> <br />t"'-~' <br />:~, <br />- , <br />r~1 <br /> <br />The Honorable Bill Bradley <br />United States Senate <br /> <br />Dear Senator Bradley: <br /> <br />The Department of the Interior's Animas-La Plata project, to be <br />constructed by Interior's Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau), was designed <br />to store water and deliver it to arid areas and communities in <br />southwestern Colorado and northwestern New Mexico, principally by <br />transferring water from the Animas River to the La Plata River basin. <br />Although the project was authorized by the Congress in 1968, more recent <br />impetus for construction came when the project was made the <br />cornerstone of a water rights settlement, which was legislatively <br />implemented by the 1988 Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement <br />Act. Under this act, the project will store and provide water for the <br />Southern Ute Indian Tribe and the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe; a <br />portion of the project is to be completed by the year 2000, or the <br />settlement could be revisited by the tribes. Before beginning construction <br />of the project, the Bureau was required under the Endangered Species Act <br />of 1973, as amended, to consult with Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(Service) to detennine whether the project would likely jeopardize the <br />continued existence of any endangered species. <br /> <br />-~jf< <br />~ <br />J~.: <br /> <br />',," <br /> <br />fl> <br /> <br />~; <br /> <br />;,.;~" <br />1;" <br />fi'~:, <br /> <br />:-,< <br />~&~', <br />ii1', <br />~:~< <br />j;,,; <br />f~~" <br /> <br />~ <br />iff4 <br /> <br />'.,'.:., <br /> <br />As agreed with your office, this report provides infonnation on the history <br />and status of the Animas-La Plata project (see app. D; the legislative <br />framework provided for the project by the 1988 Settlement Act (see app. <br />II) and the Endangered Species Act (see app.lII); the consultation <br />between the Bureau and the Service under the Endangered Species Act <br />(see app. IV); and the project's relationship to another congressionally <br />authorized project, the Navlijo Indian Irrigation Project (NllP) (see app. V). <br /> <br />iJ.'.: <br />i <br />~~~j <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />In May 1990, the Service issued a draft "biological opinion" stating that the <br />project, in depleting water from the Animas River and thereby reducing its <br />flow, would likely jeopardize the endangered Colorado squawfish in the <br />San Juan River, downstream from the project. The Bureau and the Service <br />consulted over the next several months to develop what is termed a <br />"reasonable and prudent alternative" to the project (referred to hereinafter <br />as the "alternative"), which the Service believes would not likely <br /> <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />GAOIRCED-96-1 Anlmas-La Plata ProJect <br />