Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Appendix I <br />Background on and Overview of the <br />Anlmu-La Plata Project <br /> <br />In 1938, the Bureau began studying the feasibility of transferring water <br />from the Animas River to the La Plata River basin. In 1966, the Bureau <br />prepared a feasibility report for the project, which was subsequently <br />authorized through the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968. <br /> <br />In 1976, the United States filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Southern Ute and <br />Ute Mountain Ute Indian tribes to identify and obtain (Le., "quantify") their <br />rights to water flowing in several rivers on or near their reselVations, <br />including the Animas and La Plata rivers. The State Engineer of Colorado, <br />projecting the impact of the Ute Indians' claims on non-Indian water users, <br />determined that the tribes' claims could have a severe impact on these <br />users. For example, he believed that during years of water shortage, the <br />tribes could have rights to virtually all the available water in numerous <br />streams and rivers in the San Juan River basin. <br /> <br />Because land ownership on the Southern Ute Reservation was mixed, with <br />non-Indians owning and farming land along the La Plata River, these legal <br />proceedings created a great deal of tension between the Southern Utes <br />and local non-Indians. To avoid an expensive and disruptive outcome, the <br />tribes, local communities, non-Indian irrigators, state of Colorado, and <br />federal government negotiated a settlement of the tribes' claims. In 1988, <br />the Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act (p.L. 100-585) made <br />the Animas-La Plata project the cornerstone of this negotiated settlement <br />of the Utes' water rights claims.3 (App. IT provides information on the 1988 <br />Settlement Act.) <br /> <br />In 1979, the Service had issued a biological opinion concerning the <br />potential effects of the proposed Animas-La Plata project on the <br />endangered Colorado squawfish. (App. ill provides information on <br />requirements under the Endangered Species Act and on the Colorado <br />squawfish.) At that time, on the basis of the capture of a single juvenile <br />Colorado squawfish in the San Juan River, the Service concluded because <br />of its "already tenuous hold on survival, its possible loss should have little <br />impact on . . . the species itself." However, the Service recommended that <br />the Bureau thoroughly survey the native fish populations of the San Juan <br />River and determine the environmental needs of the squawfish. Surveys of <br />fisheries conducted from 1987 to 1989 discovered more Colorado <br />squawfish than had previously been known and revealed potential effects <br />of the project that had not been considered in the Service's 1979 biological <br />opinion. <br /> <br />'The Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe also has the right to receive water from the Dolores Prqject, <br />another Bureau project in Colorado. <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />GAOIRCED-96-1 Anlmae-La Plata Project <br />