Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PRELIMINARY DRAFT <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />(See Exhibits 2A and 28 for a supplemental breakdown of this summary) <br /> <br />Colorado River storage Project and Participating Projects <br />Income and Expense Summary <br />FY 1994 <br /> Thousands of Dollars <br /> 9/30/94 9/30/93 Chanae <br />Income <br />Repayment Contracts 34,701 3,790 30,911 1/ <br />Operating Income <br />Power 113,190 113,815 (625) 21 <br />M&I Water 1,831 1,041 790 <br />Non~Operating Intorne (69) 1,105 (1,174) 31 <br />Total Income 149,653 119,751 29,902 <br />Expense <br />Non-Reimbursable Expenses 33,372 45,339 (11,967) 4/ <br />Reimbursable Operating Expenses <br />Power <br />Operation and Maintenance 65,772 47,568 18,204 5/ <br />Depreciation and Replacement 20,381 6,244 14,137 <br />Interest on Inve6tment 35,957 42,418 (6,461) <br />M&I Water <br />Operation and Maintenance 98 111 (13) 6/ <br />Interest on Investment 325 331 (6) <br />Accrued Unused Annual Leave M Unfunded (1,355) 255 (1,610) <br />Total Expense 154,550 142,266 12,284 <br />Net Income (4,897) (22,515) 17,618 <br />Prior-year Adjustment - Interest on Investment (38,200) 0 (38,200) 71 <br />Prior-year Adjustment - Depreciation (178,287) 0 (178,287) 8/ <br />Adjusted Net Income (221 ,384) (22,515) (198,869) <br /> <br />11 Includes a $33.5 million lump sum repayment of Jordan Aqueduct (CUP - Bonneville Unit). <br /> <br />21 Power revenues tor FY~93, as shown here, are $30.9 million less than power revenues reported on the 1993 CRSP Annual <br />Report. This difference is due to the tact that revenues transferred from Western to Reclamation were counted twice on <br />on the 1993 report, thereby resultin~ in power revenues being overstated by $30.9 million. <br /> <br />3/ Includes a $473,000 decrease due to write off of several Reclamation Reform Act (RRA) bills (Bostwick park Project). <br /> <br />41 The $33.4 million Shown for FY-94 Includes $21 million in Glen Canyon EIS, related studies, and purchased power costs, <br />which are presently,belng classified as non-reimbursable for FY-94; however, this classification is subject to change, since <br />a final determlnatlpn has not yet been made as to whether these costs are reimbursable or non~reimbursable. The $45.3 <br />million shown for FY~93 includes $38.3 million in Glen Canyon EIS and related studies costs for FY.83 through FY-92, which <br />were reclassified from reimbursable to non-reimbursable per Section 1807 of P.l. 102-575. <br /> <br />5/ The $47,6 million shown for FY-93 includes a $37.7 million credit for the power portion of the reclassification of prior-year <br />Glen Canyon EIS .and related studies costs described in footnote 4 above. This $47.6 million also includes $15.7 million in <br />Glen Canyon EIS, related studies, and purchased power costs, which are currently being classified as reimbursable for <br />FY ~93. However, this classification is also subject to change, depending on the outcome of the final determination <br />described in footnote 4 above. <br /> <br />61 The $111 ,000 shown for FY-93 Includes a $595,000 credit forthe M&I portion of the reclassification of prior-year Glen <br />Canyon EIS and related studies costs described in footnote 4 above. <br /> <br />7/ During FY-94, Western reclassified $38.2 million of Interest During Construction to Interest on Investment. <br /> <br />8/ In FY-94, both Reolamatlon and Western changed their method of accounting for depreciation from compound-interest <br />to straight-line, as explained In Finance and Accounting Services Directive No. CST-21-94, dated 9/22/94. <br />