Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />PART V <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY ASSESS~ENT <br /> <br />...... <br />Ul <br />...... <br />-J <br /> <br />Another potential problem is the conflict betl.'een the cold .....ater sport <br />fishery in tailwater streams and the warm water requirements of endan- <br />gered fish further downstream. These are examples of loIater qual iry <br />management alternatives Iohich may be beneficial to one user and detri- <br />mental to another. At present, the policy is multiple use, and Reclama- <br />tion has tried to optimize the greatest overall benefits. <br /> <br />2. Economic and Health Impacts <br /> <br />In the Lo....er Basin, present peak TDS concentrations are <br />approaching critical levels for some salt sensitive crops and, l.Ihile <br />suitable for irrigation of most crops, are high enough that special <br />irrigation practices are used in some cases. At the present time, TOS <br />concentrations are being maintained below the standards. Complete <br />development of apportioned water by the States will result in increases <br />in TOS that would be more detrimental to agriculture without salinity <br />control measures. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A consortium of ....ater resources centers in the States of <br />Arizona, California, Colorado, and Utah cooperated in a study funded by <br />the Office of Water Research and Technology and the Bureau of Reclamation <br />to assess the economic damages caused by various salt concentrations to <br />agricultural and municipal water users. This study is documented in <br />a report, Salinit ~anagement 0 tions for the Colorado River, Water <br />Resources Planning Series Report P-78-003, June 1978. 12 <br /> <br />Based upon the findings of that report, Reclamation has pub- <br />lished a summary ....orking document entitled, Colorado River Salinity-- <br />Economic Impacts on Agricultural, Municipal, and Industrial Users.rI3} <br />The estimated future annual damaF;es to the LOloler Basin ....ater users in <br />1976 dollars were S343,OOO.!J for each 1 mg/L increase at Imperial Dam <br />when concentrations reach the range of 875 mg/L to 1,225 mg/L. This <br />damage figure is approximately S513,300.!J per mgfL in 1982 dollars. <br />These annual damages were calculated using the 1972 sal inity standard of <br />879 mg/L (approved by EPA in 1975) and a projected full development <br />salinity concentration of 1,225 mg/L at Imperial Darn. <br /> <br />The annual municipal damages are divided as follo....s: Metro- <br />politan ....'ater District, 54 percent; Central Arizona Project, B percent; <br />and LO\o'€r Mainstem users, B percent. Total agriculture annual damages <br />are 30 percent. Industrial impairments are not separated from municipal <br />cost estimates. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The health impacts of high TDS waters presently are poorlv <br />understood and are a subject of some debate. High suI fate ....aters fre- <br />quently exceeding 500 mg/L for local domestic supplies are known to cause <br />problems in sensit ive people, particularly infants, and to visitors who <br />have not developed a tolerance. High levels of sodium in drinking water <br />supplies may aggravate high blood pressure problems. <br /> <br />1/ <br />damages <br /> <br />The annual damages represent impact to users belo. Hoover Dam; <br />from projects located downstream of Hoover Dam ....ill be less. <br /> <br />22 <br />