My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04875
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:42:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.600.20
Description
Colorado River Interim Surplus
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/3/1991
Author
UCRC
Title
Draft Proposal for Defining Surplus River Conditions
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />released from Lake Powell. <br />equalization with Lake Mead <br /> <br />Additional flows were <br />and to avoid spills. <br /> <br />released when required for <br /> <br />Lake Mead was operated so as to release wate~ only to met downstream delivery <br />requirements, or to meet the requirements of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />Flood Control Regulations. Because of the simplicity of this study, no <br />provisions were made for scheduled deliveries to Mexico of more than 1.5 <br />million acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />~Flood control releases from Lake Mead were identified where hydrologic <br />vzs~narios were sufficient to produce them. For those hydrologic scenarios <br />~ ~~ich did not produce a flood control release for the five year period, the <br />~' ~ initial contents of Lake Powell and Lake Mead were adjusted until a release <br />~~ ~ was triggered. This identified the ,nitia1 contents require 1n La eS Powell <br />~~ and Mead in order to generate a flood control release, under each selected <br />~ hydrology scenario, and thereby produce water which was surplus to the system. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />VII. Results <br /> <br />./ <br />~E'(,' <br />oi~'(; <br />~,V. <br /> <br />(, <br /> <br />The outcome of this study indicate that the meth~~and software perform as <br />contemplated. When the operating criteria is a~uniformly and demands are <br />consistent, the Colorado River system is driven by the amplitude of the <br />assumed hydrology and initial conditions. Therefore, th~~y of a <br />flood control release under CULrent reservoir conditions LS lrectly related <br />to the magnitude of the assumed hydrology. A flood control release under <br />current reservoi~ conditions does not occur until the assumed 5 year hydrology <br />approaches 90% probability of nonexceedence. <br /> <br />In order for a flood control release to be made at Lake ~lead under the minimum <br />.probable 5 year hydrotogic scenarios, the Lake Powell and Lake Mead mU,st be <br />initially full. Under such conditions, a small flood control release would be <br />made in January, 1992, then the reservoir system would be continually drawn <br />down until the end of the study. Under a 25% hydrology Lake powell and Lake <br />Mead must also begin almost full to generate a flood control releas~. At 50% <br />and 75% hydrologys, the initial reservoir contents must be adjusted above <br />current conditions in order force a flood control release within the 5 year <br />study period. <br /> <br />A summary of end of study surface storages at Lake Powell and Lake Mead are <br />listed below for selected hydrologic probabilities. For hydrologic <br />probabilities of 5%, 25%, 50%, and 75%, the summary includes end of study <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.