Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tv <br />c..,.) <br />("J') <br />('.) <br /> <br />J-: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />permit Mexico to reduce to a minimum her requirement for addi- <br />tional water during these two months. <br /> <br />Mexico's ordering of additional quantities of water during <br />January has had beneficial results other than improving the <br />quality of water being delivered to Mexico. Requirements for <br />irrigation water in the United states during December have <br />been at an extremely low level as a result of several weeks <br />of damp, cold weather. As a result of the curtailed releases <br />from Parker Dam, because of the low irrigation requirements, <br />it was necessary to reduce releases from Davis Dam in like <br />amounts in order to maintain flood control space in Havasu <br />Lake behind Parker Dam. As a consequence of these extreme <br />reductions in releases the power production at these dams was <br />sharply curtailed, resulting in potential inability to deliver <br />contract quantities of power and energy from Davis and Parker <br />Powerp1ants. To meet these contract commitments, it became <br />necessary to draw on an interchange credit account in Lake <br />Mead to such an extent that this account was nearly depleted. <br />The increased releases from parker to meet the new schedule of <br />deliveries to Mexico along with the normal increase in deliver- <br />ies to other users below Parker Dam resulted in our again being <br />able to meet our power and energy delivery commitments within <br />the limits of the power interchange account in Lake Mead. <br /> <br />In summary, the Bureau of Reclamation is operating the system <br />of dams and reservoirs on the Colorado River in the lower basin <br />in accord with acts of Congress, in accord with power and water <br />contracts written under provisions of those acts, and in accord <br />with the provisions of the Treaty with Mexico. To operate the <br />river in a different manner would require revision of the <br />acts of Congress, the contracts, or the Treaty." <br /> <br />2. Comments. <br /> <br />Recent newspaper articles have kept members of the Colo- <br />rado Water Conservation Board and others throughout the state in- <br />terested in the development of our water resources familiar with <br />the recent problems that have arisen in regard to the 1944 Treaty <br />between the united States and the Republic of Mexico. The Colorado <br />River Water Users Association, an organization of the seven Colo- <br />rado River Basin states, became as extremely concerned as we in <br />Colorado are, and to that end called a meeting of the Board of <br />Directors for January 5, 1962, and held in Las Vegas, Nevada. <br />Although not a member of the Board of Directors of this Association, <br />the Acting Director of the State Water Board felt that this prob- <br />lem was of sufficient concern to warrant attendance and was present <br />" <br /> <br />Information Bulletin #18 <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />January l2, 1962 <br /> <br />.L~ <br /> <br />t,; <br />l?j~ <br />