My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04854
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04854
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:41:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/20/1944
Author
Jean Breitenstein
Title
Memorandum Concerning Proposed Treaty Between the United States and Mexico Over Use of the Waters of the Border Streams
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4. The United States shall construct or acquire in its own territory the works necessary <br />to convey water to the Mexico diversion points on the international land boundary, including <br />(a) tho canal and other works from the low.r end of the Pilot Knob Wasteway ro the inter- <br />narional boundary and. (b) if requested by Mexico. a canal connecting the main diversion <br />structure rEferred to in number 1 to the international boundary near San Luis, Sonora. All <br />these works shall be constructed or acquired and operated and maintained at the expense of <br />Mexico; <br /> <br />5. Stream gaging stations and water measuring devices shall be constructed, operated, <br />and maintained in the limitrophe section of the river and on all facilities used for the delivery <br />of water to Mexico; <br /> <br />6, Flood-control works on the lower Colorado between Imperial Dam and the Gulf <br />of Mexico shall be constructed as recommended by the Commission and approved by rhe two <br />Governments. <br /> <br />The foregoing itemization includes all the works which the proposed treary provides for con- <br />struction in the Colorado River Basin. The Commission is given no power to construct any other <br />works whatsoever. This fact must be borne in mind when considering the general provisions con- <br />tained in Part V of the treaty. Ie is simply not true to state that the United States Commissioner has <br />power under the treaty "to acquire title to, control. and where not constructed, to construct and <br />operate all Water, flood control. and hydroeh?ctc1c power projects on these river systems in the United <br />States to the extent he deems such works connected with or affecting the carrying out of the treaty." <br />Th. Commission has no powers other than those specifically given ir by the tr<aty. and the treaty does <br />not give to the Commission or either Commissioner the power to do those things mentioned in the <br />above quotation. <br /> <br />The objectors to the treaty in their criticism of the powers of the Commission refer to Article <br />24, Section (a) of this Acricl. giv<s the Commission the power to investigate and develop plans <br />"for the works which are to be constructed or established in accordance with the provision of this <br />and other treaties or agreements in force between the two Governments dealing with boundaries and <br />international waters." It is clen that this authorization of power is restricted to works provided for <br />in the treaties. The Commission may not exceed such powers. So far as the Colorado River is con- <br />cerned. the works to be constructed are specifically mentioned in Articles 12 and 13 to which reference <br />has already been made. There is no authorization in the treaty for the construction of any other works <br />along the Colorado River. <br /> <br />Section (b) of Article 24 authorizes che Commission to construct, operate and maintain or <br />supervise- the conscruction. operation, and maintenance of Hthe works agreed upon." It should be <br />recalled that Article 12 contemplates the Commission agreeing upon the works necessary to protect the <br />lands in the United States from ftood and seepage damage. Article I3 contemplates the Commission <br />agreeing upon the necessary ftood control works between the Imperial Dam and the Gulf of California, <br />There is nowhere in the treaty any provision which authorizes the Commission [0 agree upon the <br />conscruction of any other works. Since the authorization is not contained in the treaty, it simply does <br />not exist. <br /> <br />Section (c) of Article 24 authorizes the Commission to exercise "[he specific powers and duties <br />entrusted to the Commission" and to prevent the violation of the treaty. Here, again. the Commission <br />is restricted to the specific powers and duties granted to and imposed upon it by the treaties. <br /> <br />Section (d) of Article 24 authorizes the Commission to setrle differences with respect to the <br />interpretation or applicJtion of the treaty Jnd provides for the procedure in the event the two <br />Commissioners disagree. <br /> <br />Section (e) of Article 24 requires the Commission to furnish certain information. <br /> <br />Section (f) of Article 24 provides for the construction, operation. and maincenancc of stream- <br />gaging stations. <br /> <br />Section (g) of Article 24 requires the Commission to report annually to rhe rwo Governments. <br /> <br />I3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.