WSP04854 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Treaty Provisions Relating to the Necessary Facilities For, and the Administrative Methods of, Enforcement. Are Proper and Adequate and Fairly Protect Rights of United States Interests For the proposed treaty to be effective. it is most obviously necessary that pcoper facilities be provided foc caeeying it into effece and that some responsible adminisrrative body be set up to enforce its provisions. Those who are attacking tbe ratification of the treaty have placed more emphasis on jts administrative provisions than on any other of its features. This method of attack has bad the pur- pose and effece of drawing arcention away from the desirability of making a treaty at this time and from the substantive provisions of the treaty. Ie must always be remembered that rhe proposed creaty is between two sovereign nations, This face is unaffected by the disparity in size, population. wealth. and military potential exisring between the United States and Mexico. In any dealings between two sovereigns, the obligations and duties imposed upon or accepted by one nation must be performed by that nation. Such duties and obliga- tions may not be delegated to private interescs or local governmental subdivisions. Hence. it would be impossible for the state of California. or any of its political subdivisions, or any of its private in- terests, to receive or assume the responsibility of the United Sutes in the performance of the proposed rreaty. This is clearly a function of the United States to be carried out through some appropriate agency, A refusal to recognize this simple face is probably the cause of much of the California opp~sition to the treaty. As an administrative agency. the treaty adopts the International Boundary Commission, the name of which has been changed to "International Boundary and Water Commission. United States and Mexico." The International Boundary Commission had its origin in Article 2 of the Convention of 1882. where it was created as a joint surveying party to run the international boundary and set monuments. The International Boundary Convention of 1889 by its Article 2 provided specifically for an International Boundary Commission composed of one Commissioner from each country. ap- pointed respectively by the President of that country in accordance with its constitutional provisions. The Commission was given definite powers in connection with boundaries and with works constructed in the Rio Grande and in the Colorado River in violation of the treaties of 1853 and 1884. The term of the Commission was five years, This was extended several times and by the Convention of 1900 was extended indefinitely with a provision for termination by either party on six months' notice. The proposed treaty now before the Senate changes the name of the Commission as indica red above and continues the 1889 Convention indefinitely. The Commission is entirely a creature of the treaties mentioned and of the proposed treaty. There are no other authorizations for its existence. It has no general powers. The powers which it has are those which are particularly delegated to it. The American member receives and holds his office in accordance with laws of the United States. There is nothing to prevent any change in such laws which Congress may deem wise and necessary. The International Boundary Commission has functioned for over half a century, Ie has worked satisfactorily in the handling of international boundary matters. Its past success indicates that tbere may be a reasonable expectation of irs ability to, handle the additional duties imposed by the treaty noW up for ratification. The jurisdiceion of the Commission is specifically and clearly defined in Article 2 of the treaty: "The jurisdiction of the Commission shall extend to the limitrophe parts of the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo) and the Colorado River. to the land boundary between the two couneries. and to works located upon their common boundary, each Section of the Commission retaining jurisdiction over that part of tbe works located within the limits of its own country. Neither Section shall assume jurisdiction or control over works located within tbe limits of the country "