Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Actual Operations Under Criteria - Water year 1988 <br /> <br />The initial plan of operation for water year beginning October <br />I, 1987, and ending September 30, 1988, was based on <br />forecasted reservoir inflow conditions for October through <br />January and average inflow conditions through the rest of the <br />water year 1988 and scheduled releases from Lake Powell of <br />11.2 million acre-feet (MAF). T4is plan of operation would <br />have created 5.05 MAF of vacant space in the Colorado River <br />reservoir system by the end of September 1988, of which 1.8 <br />MAF would have been in Lake Powell. With this plan of <br />operation the contents of Lakes Powell and Mead would have <br />been within 1.4 MAF of each other at the end of September <br />1988. <br /> <br />The April through July forecast of runoff into Lake Powell <br />made on January 1, 1988, waS 6.8 MAF or 83 percent of the <br />long term average. The long term average is calculated by the <br />Bureau of Reclamation using 80 years of natural flow data <br />(1906-1985) and current depletion levels. Accordingly, <br />releases from Glen Canyon Powerplant averaged about <br />14,000 cubic feet per second (efs) or 42 percent of maximum <br />powerplant capacity for January through February. The <br />monthly April-July forecasts increased slightly for February <br />then decreased each month until on June 1, the forecast was <br />5.1 MAF or 63 percent of the long-term average. In response <br />to these forecasts and to insure filling Lake Powell, <br />powerplant releases averaged 11,400 cfs for March, 9,100 cfS <br />for the months April through June, and 11,700 cfs for July. <br /> <br />Climatic conditions for the water year 1988 were very dry for <br />much of the Upper Colorado Region and surrounding areas. <br />The western states were dominated by high pressure zones <br />throughout the year resulting in lower than normal <br />precipitation. The amounts of precipitation for the water year <br />ranged from much below normal (less than 50 percent) over <br />the Upper Green River Basin to near or slightly above normal <br />in the San Juan drainage. <br /> <br />Lake Powell inflows remained below average through the <br />spring runoff with a snowmelt runoff peak of 34,900 cfs being <br />ohserved on May 22, 1988. The actual unregulated April'July <br />runoff into Lake Powell was 4.8 MAF in 1988, or 59 percent <br />of average. Unregulated runoff is the inflow to Lake Powell <br />adjusted for the change in storage of the upstream reservoirs <br />discussed in this report. The lake reached its maximum <br />elevation on July 5,1988 of3,69331 feet, or 95.75 percent full. <br /> <br />The total unregulated runoff flow into Lake Powell for the <br />water year was 8.2 MAF or 68 percent of the long-term <br />average. Water supply for the San Juan River above Navajo <br />Dam for the water year was also 68 percent, while the <br />Gunnison River above Blue Mesa Dam was 56 percent, the <br />mainstem Colorado River above Grand J unction, Colorado <br />was 75 percent, and the Green River above Flaming Gorge <br />Dam was at 54 percent of the long'term average. Total <br />releases from Glen Canyon Dam were 823 MAF while the <br />regulated inflow for the year was 8.6 MAF. <br /> <br />As required by Section 602 of Public Law 90-537, the <br />operation of the Colorado River system is coordinated with <br />Federal and State agencies that have interest in the Colorado <br />River. The Annual Operating Plan (AOP) for water year 1988 <br />was prepared by the Bureau of Reclamation in consultation <br />with representatives from the Governors office of the seven <br />Basin States, the Upper Colorado River Commission, the <br />International Boundary and Water Commission, the U.S. <br />Corps of Engineers, and Western Area Power <br />Administration. Tbese same representatives are consulted as <br />river operations under the AOP are modified as required <br />during the year as runoff predictions are adjusted to snowpack <br />and climate variability. These consultations are with a <br />technical forum for resolving operational issues on the <br />Colorado River. <br /> <br />2 <br />