Laserfiche WebLink
<br />River Regulation <br /> <br />Daily releases are made from the storage reservoirs in the <br />Lower Basin to meet the incoming orders of the water user <br />agencies or for the regulation of flood control space and <br />releases of excess water. When possible, all water passes <br />through the powerplant units.', The daily releases are <br />regulated on an hourly basis to meet, as nearly as possible the <br />peaking power needs ofthe hydroelectric power customers. <br />Minimum daily flow objectives are 'provided in the river to <br />maintain fIshery habitat. <br /> <br />The combination of high reservoir conditions and river <br />regulation below Hoover Dam resulted in, a total water year <br />1988 delivery to Mexico of approximaiely 1.0 MAF in excess <br />of the scheduled treaty deliveries (1,700,000 acre-feet per <br />calendar year)., Of that amount, 97,000 acre-feet of drainage <br />waters were bypassed to the Gulf of California via the Bypass <br />Drain during water year 1988. This bypass channel was <br />constructed pursuant to provisions of Minute No. 242 of the <br />International Boundary and Water Commission. <br /> <br />Flood Control <br /> <br />Lake Mead is operated in accordance with flood control <br />regulations specified in the Field Working Agreement <br />between Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers, signed in <br />1982. The regulations stipulate minimum release levels from <br />Lake Mead to route the reasonable maximum inflow. The <br />reasonable maximum inflow is the estimated inflow volume <br />that, on the average, will not be exceeded 19 out of 20 times. <br />This volume is derived by adding an "uncertaintY' term to the <br />most probable runoff forecast. In 1983, unusual <br />hydrometeorological events resulted in unprecedented large <br />forecasting errors. Subsequent reassessment of the estimate <br />of the "uncertainty" term led to adoption of larger values for <br />use in determining the probable maximum inflow in 1984 and <br />thereafter. <br /> <br />Routine maintenance and repair of bankIine damage was <br />carried out during water year 1988. As in the previous year, <br />some bankline erosion was experienced in the Lower Basin of <br />the Colorado River. In some river reaches, especially the <br />Mohave Valley, greater than normal bankline erosion was <br />caused in part by increased wave action from boating and <br />other recreational river traffic. <br /> <br />Degradation in some reaches of the river channel has <br />continued, resulting in a lowering of the river water surface <br />elevation for any given discharge. In a few areas, bowever, ihe <br />river channel has aggraded due to heavy sediment loads. <br /> <br />Total Colorado River reservoir system storage at the start of <br />water yearl988 was approximately 54,921,000 acre-feet and <br />about 52,404,000 acre-feet at the end of the water year, <br />representing a 2,517,000 acre-foot increase in total remaining <br />available reservoir space. <br /> <br />In addition to the mainstem structures, Alamo Dam on the <br />Bill Williams River (in the Lower Basin) recei~ed minor flood <br />inflow during water year 1988. During water year 1989, <br />Painted Rock and Alamo Reservoirs are scheduled to be <br />operated in accordance with established flood control criteria <br />to maximize the available flood control space in their <br />respective reservoirs. <br /> <br />21 <br />