My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04849
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04849
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8021
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Western States Water Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/1/2002
Author
Interstate Council
Title
A Critique of the USGS National Streamflow Information Program and Considerations in Establishing a National Streamgaging Network - Interstate Council on Water Policy
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OD3Jl2 <br /> <br />METRICS FOR STREAM GAGING GOALS <br /> <br />There is associated with each goal, a metric to quantify the goal, thereby allowing evaluation <br />of the existing network of USGS gages, as well as compatible gages supported by other agencies, <br />in meeting that goal. Furthermore, from this analysis, the number of additional gages needed to <br />supplement the existing network so each goal is fully met can be determined, The metrics and <br />inventory of gages existing or needed to meet each of the fourteen stream gaging goals is presented <br />in the table below. A total of 18,330 gaging stations are estimated to be required to meet the over <br />30,000 coverage requirements needed for the fourteen goals. A number of the gages would help <br />meet more than one goal as indicated: <br />Number of Gaging Stations <br />149 <br />],800 <br />4,170 <br />12,210 <br /> <br />Number of Goals Met <br />Over 5 <br />3 or 4 <br />2 <br />I <br /> <br />FINDING 8 - DON'T USE BROAD METRICS FOR EV ALUA TING STREAM GAGING GOALS <br /> <br />While the workshops did not produce any significant and specific new or modified metrics <br />for these goals, there was considerable concern about the threshholds used in many of the metrics <br />to filter the gage coverage necessary to accommodate the goals, For example, the water diversion <br />goal's standard of diverting 25% of the mean annual flow ofa river was felt to be too coarse for <br />meaningful management considerations, exemplified by the small number of gages required to meet <br />the goaL Similarly, applying the reservoir goal to projects over 50,000 acre-feet was seen as <br />limiting. The use of HUC-6 hydrologic accounting units overlooked the smaller scale watersheds <br />of real concern as well as representative streams, There is a strong advocacy for conducting case-by- <br />case evaluation of gage coverage for meeting specific goals as opposed to using broad metrics <br />meeting national perspectives of information needs, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.