My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04842
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:27:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8067
Description
Section D General Federal Issues/Policies-Section 7 Consultations
Date
7/14/1976
Author
Frank E Maynes
Title
Federal Water Rights 1973-83-A General Discussion of the Federal Reserved Rights Doctrine
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O1l2035 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />direct the Secretary of the Interior to acquire~ by purchase or by <br /> <br />eminent domain at fair market value, non-Indian lands with surface water <br /> <br />rights and transfer these rights to the five central Arizona tribes in <br /> <br />satisfaction of present and future water rights. <br /> <br />Third, the report of the National Water Commission has recommended <br /> <br />that present water supplies be augmented by alternative sources. There <br /> <br />is a moratorium on such augmentation procedures until 1978, but it is <br /> <br />anticipated that water augmentation would be a viable alternative to <br /> <br />continued conflicts between adjudicated states rights and those of <br /> <br />federal enclaves and the private rights of Indians. <br /> <br />Lawsuits have also been filed to determine the water rights of the <br /> <br />United States Government in federal~.enclaves. The United States Supreme <br /> <br />Court in United States ~ District Court In and for the County of Ea~le, <br /> <br />interpreted McCarren Amendment as Congressional consent of the United <br /> <br />States to be joined in general water adjudications in state courta. <br /> <br />After the decision of United States Supreme Court in the Eagle <br /> <br />County case of 1971, the United States filed in the state court extensive <br /> <br />...claims for water in Water Divisions 4, 5 and 6 in the State of Colorado. <br /> <br />The quantity and quality and uses of water claimed by the United States <br /> <br />were of great magnitude. In many instances the claims conflicted with <br /> <br />historic state concepts of water utilization. For example, a water right <br /> <br />claimed for asthetic purposes on a stream running through the National <br /> <br />Forest or for wildlife usage does not exactly fit historic water utilization <br /> <br />concepts within the State of Colorado. Because of the complexity of the <br /> <br />claims, a Master Referee was appointed to hear all claims in the three <br /> <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.