My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04826
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:47 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:40:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1939
Author
Metro Water District
Title
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California - History and First Annual Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br />f <br /> <br />, ,. ,." <br />.l....~~.' CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES <br /> <br />I3I <br /> <br />power was indicated by these studies and, assuming a 5%-year de- <br />mand period, the energy required was estimated at 235,000,000 kw- <br />hI' with a possible maximum of 270,000,000 kw-hr. The various al- <br />ternatives considered as sources of power supply for aqueduct con- <br />struction included the following: (1) Existing utilities, with de- <br />li,'err to District transmission lines at one or several points; (2) a <br />District steam-electric plant on the Pacific Coast with a transmis- <br />sion system to and along the aqueduct; (3) a Diesel-electric plant <br />near Colton with transmission system along the aqueduct; (4) six <br />Diesel-electric plants, located at approximately equal distances <br />along the aqueduct; (5) Diesel-electric units and direct Diesel <br />drive, where possible, at each load center. <br /> <br />Using published rates as a basis, without any allowance for the <br />possibility of special municipal rates, power purchased from ex- <br />isting utilities was found to be lowest in cost delivered at the load <br />points followed by the other methods in the order listed in the pre- <br />ceding paragraph. Furthermore, purchased power could be deliver- <br />ed immediately upon completion of the transmission system, where- <br />as to acquire equipment and build a steam-electric plant would have <br />required upwards of 18 months, and to deliver and install large <br />Diesel units from 6 to 12 months. A very important advantage of <br />a purchased power supply lay in the fact that such a power supply <br />could be instantly increased up to the limit of the transformer ca- <br />pacity and, in the event further expansion should be necessary, addi- <br />tional transformers could be obtained in less time than would be <br />required for the purchase and installation of additional Diesel or <br />steam units. <br /> <br />On June 4, 1932 a notice was issued inviting bids for supplying <br />electric power for the construction of the aqueduct, under three <br />alternative items providing for delivery at one or several points <br />in the vicinity of or along the aqueduct route. A joint bid from <br />the Southern California Edison Company, Ltd., Southern Sierras <br />Power Company, and Los Angeles Gas and Electric Corporation <br />was made under one item only of the notice, namely, for delivery <br />at Colton of 23,000 kilowatts (30,800 horsepower) at 66,000 volts, <br />and an additional 4,000 kw upon request of the District made at <br />any time during the life of the contract. The rate bid was $1,500 <br />per month for 66 months after beginning power delivery, plus <br />95 cents per month per kilowatt of maximum demand, plus 5 mills <br />per kilowatt hour, with a minimum charge of $3,000 per month. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.