My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04817
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04817
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.600.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1995
Title
Monitoring and Evaluation Report - Lower Gunnison - Colorado Unit - 1995 Annual Reprt
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.l\) <br />l\' <br />t~ Table 11 - Federal Procedure Cost per Ton of Salt Saved1 <br />CD <br /> <br />Cumulative Federal Dol1.ars Invested per Activity [1988 thru 1995) <br /> <br /> Federal <br /> Monitoring Information AmortIzed Reported Dollars <br />financial Technical an:! an:! Total Salt per Ton <br />Assfatanc:e1'Z AssIstanc:ez E....luet!onz Educe t I on2 Totalz 2S year 7.7SX ReductlonJ per Year <br />(S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (tons) (S) <br /> <br />7,717,251 <br /> <br />7,JOO,OOO <br /> <br />919,000 <br /> <br />856,120 <br /> <br />16,792,J71 1,5J9,692 <br /> <br />26,678 <br /> <br />57.71 <br /> <br />1 - Actual amount paid on practices installed. The budgeted or obligated <br />amount. $11,387,848. <br />2 - Source is national budget data for Lower Gunnison, Colorado Unit. <br />3 - Source is Fy 1995 CRSC Annual progrees Report. <br />The salt reduction tons per year do not reflect the potential salt savings <br />from the planning effort or education provided. <br /> <br />3. Summary and Recommendations <br /> <br />The benefits of reduced irrigation labor requirements and increased <br />yields offset the annual cost of installing an improved system. <br />These impacts were displayed in comparison budgets (included in last <br />years report) from interviews of individual producers in the project <br />area. <br /> <br />It is recommended that conservationist maintain or enhance their <br />efforts to provide solid economic data to producers for use in their <br />decision making process. <br /> <br />A larger effort needs to be made to gain solid data on "after" or <br />implemented conditions to show the long term effects of the program. <br /> <br />Considerations should be made on the benefits of further evaluations <br />on planned conditions. Four years of evaluations on planned <br />conditions provide good support to continue with project <br />implemenation. <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.