My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04814
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:44 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.122.A
Description
Paonia Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
4/1/1957
Author
US Dept of Agricultu
Title
Report of Reappraisal of Direct Agricultural Benefits & Project Impacts: Paonia Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />interest on investment averaging about $1,893 per farm. This return <br />on investment is also available .for family living, investment, and <br />other purposes. Incomes for several farm budgets appear low when <br />compared with some irrigation proJectsurlder llloce favorilhle climatic <br />and soil conditions. However, many farmers also have nonfarm incomes. <br />The Paonia Project has evidently furnished a satisfactory living because <br />farmers have irrigated under present conditions for many years. Future <br />incomes with the project would be considerably higher than at present. <br /> <br />Increased incomes or benefits associated with proposed additienal <br />irrigation water are estimated at $15 per acre on 12,280 acres of <br />presently irrigated farms. If this same benefit is applied on a <br />per-acre basis to 2,100 acres of new land, the total annual direct <br />benefits on 14,380 acres of project land would be about $215,000. <br /> <br />Impacts of the Paonia Project on the Gunnison National Fores~ <br /> <br />As far as can now be foreseen, construction and operation of the project <br />will not require any changes in management, objectives, and physical <br />plant or services now provided on the Gunnison National Forest. However, <br />increased fire prevention services will be needed during and after the <br />construction period. <br /> <br />The county road which now serves a portion of the national forest will <br />need to be relocated. Grazing, timber, wildlife, and other resource <br />values and uses will not be affected. However, it is anticipated that <br />visitors attracted to the reservoir and the adjacent mountainous areas <br />will increase future recreational uses on nearby forest lands. <br /> <br />Construction of the proposed Paonia Reservoir will undoubtedly attract <br />large numbers of people for recreation. Therefore, recreational uses <br />of the reservoir and adjacent land should be planned and facilities <br />installed which will meet basic requirements for public health, safety, <br />property protection, and prevention of pollution. <br /> <br />Suitable lands, adjacent to the reservoir, should be reserved or acquired <br />to be retained in public ownership for these purposes. These lands <br />and the recreational facilities needed should be administered and <br />maintained by a Federal, state, or local government agency to insure <br />and protect the public interests and provide adequate public access <br />to the reservoir area. <br /> <br />Relationship of Watershed Conditions to the Paonia Project <br /> <br />The watershed above the Paonia Project covers about 791 square <br />miles and Laoludea the Anthracite-Deep Creek, Muddy Creek, Hubbard- <br />Terror Creek, and Leroux Creek subwatersheds. 'The area includes <br />various types of topography with considerable mountainous land. <br />There is no cultivated land in the upper watershed. All lands are <br />used either for grazing by livestock and big game animals ,timber <br />production, watershed protection, or recreation and wildlife areas. <br />Land ownership is 81 percent Fedral and 19 percent privately owned. <br />Vegetative cover in the upper watershed is generally good. Localized <br /> <br />vii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.