Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CONTENTS (cont.) <br /> <br />Projected Agricultural Econo~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22 <br />Sources of Information .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. 22 <br />Objectives of the Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23 <br />rypes of Farming . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. ... 23 <br />Latld Use . ., .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .... 23 <br />Size and Type- of Fams .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. * .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 25 <br />Production Rates .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 26 <br />Projected Prices .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. , .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 27 <br />Some Other Assumpti ons .. ............. .. 28 <br />Projected Agricultural Incomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 33 <br />Methodology .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 33 <br />The Projected "With" Budgets ............. 33 <br />Capi tal Investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 35 <br />Receipts .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. 'II! ... 35 <br />EJcpenses .... . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 35 <br />Net Incomes ., .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 3$ <br />Direct Agricultural Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36 <br />Yield Increases With Additional Water. . . . . . . .. 37 <br />Net Incomes Associated With Increasing Crpp Yields on <br />Presently Irrigated Land . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 37 <br />Comparison of "With-Without" Incomes for Projected <br />Budgets .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 39 <br />Findings .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .... 40 <br /> <br />III. IMPACT OF THE PA0tJIA PROJECT UPON THE ADMINISTRATION, MANAGEJYIENT, <br />AND USE OF THE GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST, OTHER FOREST LANDS, AND <br />UPON FoREST RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 41 <br />Area and OWnership Concerned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 41 <br />Present status . .. " . . . . . " " . " " " . " " " . " " " " "" 41 <br />Current Use " " " " .. .. .. . .. .. . .. ., " . . .. .. .. . .. . .... 41 <br />Present Developments .. .. . . .. .. .. . .. " .. .. .. .. .. . . . ." 42 <br />Current Management .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . .." 42 <br />Estimated Future Status loli thout Project Development . . . . . .. 42 <br />Impacts of the Project "" " " .. " " " .. " .. " " " " " " . " "" 42 <br />National Forest " " " " " " " " " " . " " " " " . " " " ." 42 <br />Other Forest and Forest Rangelands Immediately Adjacent to <br />the National Forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 43 <br />Estimated Costs " " " " " . " " .. . " " " " .. .. " " " " " " " "" 44 <br />Other Project-Imposed Costs ................ 45 <br />Bene!! ts " " " " " " " .. " _ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "" 46 <br />Findings .. " " " " .. " " " " " .. " " " .. .. " " " .. " " " " " "" 46 <br /> <br />IV. THE RELATIONSHIP OF WATERSHED CONDITIONS TO THE PAONIA PROJECT . 47 <br />Subwatersheds " " " " " " .. " " " " " .. " " . .. .. " " " " " # "" 47 <br />Watershed Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 47 <br />Ow:nership " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " .. " " "" 48 <br />Watershed Problems "."" " " .. " " " " " .. " . " " " " " "" 49 <br />Muddy Creek Subwatershed . . . . . . . . . .. ...... 49 <br />Anthracite-Deep Creek Subwatershed . . . . . . . . . . . .. 50 <br />Hubbard Creek-Terror Creek and Adjacent North Fork River <br />Slope Subwatershed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 50 <br /> <br />Ii <br />