Laserfiche WebLink
<br />structures, The Acaas not designed for vegetativeeaniPulation, Also, it <br />would have required a considerable amount of negotiation to apply a program <br />administered by the Soil Conservation Service to lands administered by the <br />Forest Service. <br /> <br />This reconnaisance did call at ten t ion to the Beaver Creek Watersheds. <br />These were later selected by the Forest Service in the fall of 1956 for a <br />detailed treatment and watershed study when $100,000 was made available by <br />the United States Congress through the efforts of Senator Hayden. The Bea- <br />ver Creek project embraces 276,000 acres and involves the joint efforts of <br />both Forest Service Research and Administration. <br /> <br />Watershed Studv <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />Following the 1954 meeting of the Tall Pines Farm Bureau and the watershed <br />tour of 1955, the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, Arizona State <br />Land Department and the University of Arizona entered into a formal agree- <br />ment on December 5, 1955, to make a study of watershed conditions on the <br />vast Salt and Verde drainages. Dr. George Barr, Head of the Department of <br />Agricultural Economics at the University, was given the responsibility of <br />assembling scientists best qualified to make the watershed study. Partici- <br />pants in this study included: C. A. Anderson, 1\1anager of the San Carlos <br />Irrigation District; Dr. H. H, Biswell of the University of California; Mr. <br />Charles F. Cooper of the University of Arizona; Mr. A. R. Croft, Forester <br />for the Forest Service in Utah; Dr. L. D. Love, Research Forester for the <br />Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station; Mr. Jay H. Price, <br />retired Regional Forester; Mr. p. B. Rowe, Hydrologist for the California <br />Forest and Range Experiment Station; and Dr. H. G. Wilm, then Associate <br />Dean of Forestry at New York State College and presently Commissioner for <br />New York's Department of Conservation. I resigned from the Forest Service <br />to participate in this study. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Each participant in the watershed study was taken on an extensive tour of the <br />Salt and Verde Watershed by Mr. West. Based upon their individual experi- <br />ences and training, each scientist submitted a report on the possibility of <br />increasing water yields through proposed treatments of vegetation types. <br />These reports were brought together and edited by Dr. Barr and published in <br />a document titled, "Recovering Rainfall". It was released in October, 1956, <br />at a dinner meeting of leaders representing many interest groups. <br /> <br />Like any new and novel idea, the Barr report aroused considerable public <br />debate. But regardless of the debate, it provided a starting point for a plan <br />of research and action that has since become the Arizona Watershed Program. <br /> <br />WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIVISION <br /> <br />I> <br /> <br />In his closing remarks at the end of the first watershed tour sponsored by the <br />Tall Pines Farm Bureau in 1955, Mr. Kel Fox recommended supporting a <br />bill that would create a division in the State Land Department for the purpose <br />of coordinating the many diverse activities of a Watershed Program. Pas_ <br />sage of Senate Bill No. 12 in March of 1956 by the State Legislature provided <br />the means for setting up the Watershed Management Division. <br /> <br />The Division first outlined a programofwatershed practices based on recom- <br />mendations of the Barr Watershed study. To encourage action on these <br />recommendations, the Division now provides liaison between the Arizona <br /> <br />- 4 - <br />