My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04759
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04759
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:35:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.20.F.1
Description
Grand Canyon Trust
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/26/1996
Author
Grand Canyon Trust
Title
Proceedings of the Colorado River Workshop 1996
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />David Getches <br /> <br /> <br />Although it is true, as Tom Moody said in his introduc- <br />tion, that I have had an opportunity to look at <br />Colorado River matters from a perspective of a state <br />official, a lawyer for water users, a representative of <br />Indian Tribes, and as an environmentalist, today I wel~ <br />come you on behalf of the Board of Trustees of the <br />Grand Canyon Trust. The welcome is as personal as it <br />is formal; I know about half of the people here from <br />working together on issues over the years. And I know <br />that this is truly a group of experts - a diverse and <br />highly motivated gronp capable of looking critically <br />and constructively at the past and future of the <br />Colorado River. <br /> <br />Meetings about the Colorado River are not unique, Or <br />even rare. We have all been to many. What is unusual <br />here is the breadth of the issues that we will tackle: <br />Indian water rights, endangered species, efficient water <br />use, hydropower, water marketing, science, public par- <br />ticipation, and institutions for river management. And <br />what is nearly unique is that we address these issues <br /> <br />DAVID GETCHES <br />Chair, Board of Trustees, Grand Canyon Trust <br />and <br />Raphael }. Moses Professor of Natural Resources Law, <br />University of Colorado School of Law, <br />Boulder Colorado <br /> <br />not in the context of some particular problem or pro- <br />ject, but with an eye to finding a better way to do all <br />that we do. This is a workshop in the fullest sense of the <br />word. It is not an educational exercise or a negotiating <br />session. And it is future oriented: "issues, ideas, and <br />directions;' as the title of this workshop tells us. So we <br />are here to work on how to do a better job of resource <br />management in the Colorado River Basin, not just to <br />exchange information uncritically or to champion the <br />cause of a particular interest. <br /> <br />In that spirit, let me share with you my perception of <br />why we may all feel dissatisfied to some degree with <br />how resources of the Colorado River Basin are now <br />managed. I think that the history of resources manage- <br />ment in the basin has followed three themes: <br /> <br />... We have solved problems piecemeal, one at a time. <br />.&. We have made commitments without enough <br />information. <br />.&. We have addressed issues in a spirit of competition <br />rather than cooperation. <br /> <br />These themes are well-documented in the rich history <br /> <br />of the Colorado River Basin. And they emerge explicit- <br /> <br />ly or implicitly in most of the seven discussion papers <br /> <br />prepared for this workshop. Let me say a few words <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.