My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04735
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04735
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.LJ
Description
Navajo Reservoir
State
NM
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Date
6/12/1975
Title
Statement on the Operation of the San Juan-Chama Project-Colorado New Mexico - and the Related Impacts in the San Juan River Basin - By S.E. Reynolds - New Mexico State Engineer
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />tha~ tpe greatest 1jfferences among authori4lls arise out of the <br /> <br /> <br />potential for reduction of channel losses, the potential for <br /> <br />. <br />9ro~nd water recovery in the Yuma area, and the safe yield of <br /> <br />the Gila River system for beneficial uses. <br /> <br />Attention is also invited to the fact that Table 1 reflects <br /> <br />no reservoir evaporation chargeable to deliveries to meet the- <br /> <br />Treaty obligation. A necessary incident of the flow regulation <br /> <br />needed to ~ake the Upper Division states Article III (d) delivery <br /> <br />~'is virtually all the regulation needed to make the Treaty Jeljveries, <br /> <br />and the associated reservoir evaporation is at the expense of the <br /> <br />upper'Division states. Little, if any, reregulation of the <br /> <br />Upper Basin release is needed in the Lower Basin to make the Treaty <br /> <br />delivery. <br /> <br />While the data of Table 1 indicate that an estimate of <br /> <br />10 maf annually available in the Lower Basin for beneficial con- <br /> <br />sumptive use and delivery to Mexico is conservative, it can be <br /> <br />demonstrated that even if the evaluation of the supply available <br /> <br />in the Lower Basin were to be reduced to as little as 9 maf annu- <br /> <br />ally, it still would not be necessary for the Upper Division to <br /> <br />deliver more than an average of 7.5 maf annually at Lee Ferry. <br /> <br />Assume for this discussion that the average virgin flow <br /> <br />(i.e. the flow as it would be if undepleted by beneficial consump- <br /> <br />tive use) of the Colorado River at Lee Ferry is 14 maf annually. <br /> <br />Under this assumption the Upper Division could deplete the Lee <br /> <br />Ferry flow by 6.5 maf annually and still deliver an average of <br /> <br />7.5 maf annually, or 75 maf in each period of ten years. With <br /> <br />an average delivery of 7.5 maf, only 1.5 maf annually would need <br /> <br />to be produced by the Lower Basin of the Colorado River system <br /> <br />tc. p~ovide a total of 9 maf annually for Lower Basin beneficial <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.