|
<br />38
<br />
<br />additional fish and wildlife habitat continue to increase, as evi-
<br />denced by the more intensive use of existing sites.
<br />
<br />Research programs by State and Federal agencies must
<br />focus their attention on developing benefit evaluation factors and
<br />identification of future needs of fish and wildlife.
<br />
<br />Other water resources functional needs such as water
<br />quality and outdoor recreation should be considered in conjunc-
<br />tion with minimum streamflow and flatwater needs for fish and
<br />wildlife,
<br />
<br />Irrigation Development
<br />
<br />Situation Statement
<br />
<br />During the last few years, not only the domestic but
<br />worldwide demands for American agricultural products have in-
<br />creased rapidly. One way in which crop and livestock agriculture
<br />in the Missouri River Basin has responded to the need for in-
<br />creased stability and productivity has been through the greater
<br />utilization of irrigation on croplands and pastures. Traditionally,
<br />irrigation has been used in this Basin mostly for reclamation of
<br />arid lands, increasing production, and helping alleviate the clima-
<br />tic variations in dryland crop and livestock agriculture. Since
<br />about 1950, however, with the expanding market for agricultural
<br />products, higher costs generally, and the need to assure produc-
<br />tion, irrigation has come to be used also as a supplemental water
<br />supply in marginal rainfall areas. Recently, even the States in
<br />higher rainfall parts of the Basin-Iowa, Missouri, Kansas,
<br />Nebraska, and Minnesota-have experienced significant in-
<br />creases in irrigated acreages. The development of center pivot
<br />sprinkler systems, which permit irrigation of much cropland with-
<br />out leveling, is another reason for the expansion of irrigation in
<br />many parts of the Basin. Coupled with these newer technologies,
<br />periodic droughts provide an unusually strong impetus to such
<br />development.
<br />
<br />Irrigation development in the Missouri Basin has been so
<br />extensive that the attendant water use accounts for close to 90
<br />percent of the total water consumed. Irrigation water use is caus-
<br />ing stream depletion ranging from minor to complete dewatering
<br />for substantial periods in some areas, especially in parts of Mon-
<br />tana, North and South Dakota, Kansas, Wyoming, Nebraska, and
<br />Colorado. In other areas, particularly eastern Colorado, Kansas,
<br />and some parts of Nebraska and Wyoming, the ground water
<br />resources are being depleted at a rapid rate. This olten has the
<br />near- or long-term effect of depleting streamflow. Competition for
<br />water for irrigation and other uses is, in many places, becoming
<br />intense.
<br />
<br />Directions
<br />
<br />Projections indicate that national as well as worldwide
<br />demand for American food and fiber will continue to rise. To
<br />ensure that the Nation's productivity will keep pace with this
<br />demand, the Missouri Basin's agricultural output will have to
<br />expand steadily during the foreseeable future. In order to achieve
<br />such expansion, supplemental water sources will be required to
<br />
<br />protect the high capital investment costs necessary to assure
<br />stabilization of the agricultural economy. Continual development
<br />of both surface and ground water for irrigation will be required.
<br />
<br />The Basin's irrigation development must be based on
<br />careful and thorough knowledge of the interrelationship of ground
<br />and surface water and an analysis of the supply available, tem-
<br />pered to allow for the preservation of water of adequate quantity
<br />and quality for other recognized uses.
<br />
<br />Irrigatecl agriculture is greatly dependent on energy for
<br />pumping and distributing water to the soli to meet crop needs. The
<br />rapid expansion of high-pressure sprinkler irrigation systems dur-
<br />ing the past 10 years has accelerated agricultural demands for
<br />energy, because sprinklers require 10 to 20 times-more energy
<br />than open-channel or low-pressure surface systems. Research
<br />and development of more efficient, low-energy surface systems
<br />should 'be pursued. New basic concepts and technology are
<br />needed also to reduce evaporation losses from sprinkler sprays
<br />and soil surfaces that have been wetted by irrigation.
<br />
<br />In the case of ground water development, decisions re-
<br />garding depletion of this resource must be made on the basis of
<br />technical analyses, and local residents should understand the
<br />consequences of exhausting the resource. State direction will be
<br />required in most cases (Montana, Colorado, Nebraska and Kan-
<br />sas have already initiated measures of this type) to manage the
<br />resource in consonance with established goals.
<br />
<br />Land Conservation and Management
<br />
<br />Situation Statement
<br />
<br />Abundant clean water and productive land are the most
<br />important natural resources and the principal basis for the Basin's
<br />strong agricultural economy. The need for conservation of the
<br />land resource, both public and private, has been recognized and
<br />stressed since the Dust Bowl days of the 1930's, when wind
<br />erosion reduced much productive land to wasteland. Likewise,
<br />water erosion decreases farmland productivity, and the effects
<br />are often permanent and irreversible. Excessive sediment pro-
<br />duced by water erosion fouls streams through reduction in water
<br />quality and stream channel deterioration, and depletes valuable
<br />storage space in reservoirs.
<br />
<br />Rural flooding, erosion, sedimentation, and drainage prob-
<br />lems are serious throughout much of the Missouri Basin, but are
<br />particularly acute in central South Dakota, western Iowa, south-
<br />eastern Nebraska, and northwestern Missouri. Efforts of indi-
<br />viduals and local, State, and Federal agencies have produced
<br />advances in land conservation and management during the past
<br />four decades. Nevertheless, at the present rate of land treatment,
<br />it would take four more decades of proper conservation and
<br />management practices to bring the Basin's lands up to optimum
<br />stabilization and productivity. In addition, new farming techniques
<br />are making certain earlier conservation practices outmoded and
<br />requiring restructuring of some measures already installed and
<br />practiced.
<br />
|