Laserfiche WebLink
<br />38 <br /> <br />additional fish and wildlife habitat continue to increase, as evi- <br />denced by the more intensive use of existing sites. <br /> <br />Research programs by State and Federal agencies must <br />focus their attention on developing benefit evaluation factors and <br />identification of future needs of fish and wildlife. <br /> <br />Other water resources functional needs such as water <br />quality and outdoor recreation should be considered in conjunc- <br />tion with minimum streamflow and flatwater needs for fish and <br />wildlife, <br /> <br />Irrigation Development <br /> <br />Situation Statement <br /> <br />During the last few years, not only the domestic but <br />worldwide demands for American agricultural products have in- <br />creased rapidly. One way in which crop and livestock agriculture <br />in the Missouri River Basin has responded to the need for in- <br />creased stability and productivity has been through the greater <br />utilization of irrigation on croplands and pastures. Traditionally, <br />irrigation has been used in this Basin mostly for reclamation of <br />arid lands, increasing production, and helping alleviate the clima- <br />tic variations in dryland crop and livestock agriculture. Since <br />about 1950, however, with the expanding market for agricultural <br />products, higher costs generally, and the need to assure produc- <br />tion, irrigation has come to be used also as a supplemental water <br />supply in marginal rainfall areas. Recently, even the States in <br />higher rainfall parts of the Basin-Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, <br />Nebraska, and Minnesota-have experienced significant in- <br />creases in irrigated acreages. The development of center pivot <br />sprinkler systems, which permit irrigation of much cropland with- <br />out leveling, is another reason for the expansion of irrigation in <br />many parts of the Basin. Coupled with these newer technologies, <br />periodic droughts provide an unusually strong impetus to such <br />development. <br /> <br />Irrigation development in the Missouri Basin has been so <br />extensive that the attendant water use accounts for close to 90 <br />percent of the total water consumed. Irrigation water use is caus- <br />ing stream depletion ranging from minor to complete dewatering <br />for substantial periods in some areas, especially in parts of Mon- <br />tana, North and South Dakota, Kansas, Wyoming, Nebraska, and <br />Colorado. In other areas, particularly eastern Colorado, Kansas, <br />and some parts of Nebraska and Wyoming, the ground water <br />resources are being depleted at a rapid rate. This olten has the <br />near- or long-term effect of depleting streamflow. Competition for <br />water for irrigation and other uses is, in many places, becoming <br />intense. <br /> <br />Directions <br /> <br />Projections indicate that national as well as worldwide <br />demand for American food and fiber will continue to rise. To <br />ensure that the Nation's productivity will keep pace with this <br />demand, the Missouri Basin's agricultural output will have to <br />expand steadily during the foreseeable future. In order to achieve <br />such expansion, supplemental water sources will be required to <br /> <br />protect the high capital investment costs necessary to assure <br />stabilization of the agricultural economy. Continual development <br />of both surface and ground water for irrigation will be required. <br /> <br />The Basin's irrigation development must be based on <br />careful and thorough knowledge of the interrelationship of ground <br />and surface water and an analysis of the supply available, tem- <br />pered to allow for the preservation of water of adequate quantity <br />and quality for other recognized uses. <br /> <br />Irrigatecl agriculture is greatly dependent on energy for <br />pumping and distributing water to the soli to meet crop needs. The <br />rapid expansion of high-pressure sprinkler irrigation systems dur- <br />ing the past 10 years has accelerated agricultural demands for <br />energy, because sprinklers require 10 to 20 times-more energy <br />than open-channel or low-pressure surface systems. Research <br />and development of more efficient, low-energy surface systems <br />should 'be pursued. New basic concepts and technology are <br />needed also to reduce evaporation losses from sprinkler sprays <br />and soil surfaces that have been wetted by irrigation. <br /> <br />In the case of ground water development, decisions re- <br />garding depletion of this resource must be made on the basis of <br />technical analyses, and local residents should understand the <br />consequences of exhausting the resource. State direction will be <br />required in most cases (Montana, Colorado, Nebraska and Kan- <br />sas have already initiated measures of this type) to manage the <br />resource in consonance with established goals. <br /> <br />Land Conservation and Management <br /> <br />Situation Statement <br /> <br />Abundant clean water and productive land are the most <br />important natural resources and the principal basis for the Basin's <br />strong agricultural economy. The need for conservation of the <br />land resource, both public and private, has been recognized and <br />stressed since the Dust Bowl days of the 1930's, when wind <br />erosion reduced much productive land to wasteland. Likewise, <br />water erosion decreases farmland productivity, and the effects <br />are often permanent and irreversible. Excessive sediment pro- <br />duced by water erosion fouls streams through reduction in water <br />quality and stream channel deterioration, and depletes valuable <br />storage space in reservoirs. <br /> <br />Rural flooding, erosion, sedimentation, and drainage prob- <br />lems are serious throughout much of the Missouri Basin, but are <br />particularly acute in central South Dakota, western Iowa, south- <br />eastern Nebraska, and northwestern Missouri. Efforts of indi- <br />viduals and local, State, and Federal agencies have produced <br />advances in land conservation and management during the past <br />four decades. Nevertheless, at the present rate of land treatment, <br />it would take four more decades of proper conservation and <br />management practices to bring the Basin's lands up to optimum <br />stabilization and productivity. In addition, new farming techniques <br />are making certain earlier conservation practices outmoded and <br />requiring restructuring of some measures already installed and <br />practiced. <br />