My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04731
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04731
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:34:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407.500
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications - Missouri River
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
8/1/1977
Author
MRBC
Title
Missouri River Basin Water Resources Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />The following are the recommendations of this report: <br /> <br />efforts should be supported in order to identify critical <br />areas where additional action can reduce losses. <br /> <br />GENERAL <br /> <br />5. Small communities throughout the Missouri Basin <br />have inadequate supplies of good quality water. It is <br />recommended that the current programs, especially <br />those of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, be ex- <br />panded to provide more emphasis on water supply for <br />rural communities. Agencies at all levels of govern. <br />ment must address this problem to achieve solutions. <br /> <br />1. The Missouri Basin Plan contains a large number of <br />specific project and program elements which are listed <br />in tables in each of the last nine chapters. There is <br />one table for basinwide plan elements and one for <br />each of the eight subbasins. Each plan element is an <br />integral part of the plan and is, therefore, specifically <br />recommended for implementation during its respective <br />time trame. <br /> <br />6. Planning efforts to preserve and enhance fish and <br />wildlife generally have been less than those for other <br />water resource management functions. In order to bet- <br />ter focus on the particular needs of fish and wildlife, <br />specific planning objectives for this function should be <br />clearly enunciated. Basic data collection should be <br />accelerated, and research is recommended to deter- <br />mine the socio.economic values and evaluate the <br />unique needs of fish and wildlife so such interests can <br />become active and equal participants in multiobjective <br />planning. <br /> <br /> <br />7. Agencies such as the National Park Service, <br />Bureau of Land Management, and the Bureau of Out- <br />door Recreation conduct programs which can meet <br />the planning needs associated with natural, historical <br />and cultural features on publiC lands. It is recom- <br />mended that funding for these programs be ex- <br />panded. Efforts are needed to inventory and evaluate <br />natural, historical and cultural features on both public <br />and private lands that could be affected by water re- <br />sources development and management. <br /> <br />BASINWIDE <br /> <br />2. Programs already formulated to control and limit <br />flood damages in the Missouri Basin, when im- <br />plemented and funded, will ultimately eliminate this <br />problem. It is recommended that these programs be <br />continued. Importantly, the programs of HUD's Fed- <br />eral Insurance Administration and the Corps of <br />Engineers as well as the National Weather Service <br />are recommended for accelerated funding. They are <br />designed to improve river forecasting and warning <br />systems, indicate safe living and working areas. in <br />order to minimize urban flooding damages and reduce <br />the likelihood of catastrophic flood losses. <br /> <br />8. Planning studies, such as the ongoing Yellowstone <br />Level B, have considered water needs for energy de- <br />velopment and all other purposes. These regional and <br />river basin programs should be continued and addi- <br />tional studies initiated as required. <br /> <br />9, Basinwide plan elements dealing with transporta- <br />tion are generally adequate. The basinwide plan ele- <br />ment to study transportation, river navigation and <br />other modes is strongly recommended for early im- <br />plementation. Other studies associated with coal <br />movement within and out of the Missouri Basin will <br />also need to be conducted. <br /> <br />3. To stabilize and enhance agricultural production, <br />increased funding and continued support should be <br />given to research programs of States and counties as <br />well as the Bureau of Reclamation and Department of <br />Agriculture programs directed at expanding and im- <br />proving irrigation practices, that complement individual <br />and group effQrts in this field. <br /> <br />10. Water.oriented recreation is receiving substantial <br />basinwide attention in Federal and State programs. <br />However, differences as to the most appropriate re- <br />creation data base and its evaluation have presented <br />a number of difficulties in ascertaining specific needs. <br />Therefore, it is recommended that the present pro- <br />grams be continued and adequately funded. Further, <br />that a program should be undertaken immediately to <br />resolve the differences in the data base and evalua. <br />tive techniques in order to properly assess the mag- <br />nitude of the water-oriented recreation need. <br /> <br />4. The land conservation and management programs <br />of the Soil Conservation Service and the States in the <br />Basin have been generally effective at controlling rural <br />flooding and associated damages. It is recommended <br />that these programs be sustained and that funding be <br />accelerated. Also, related research and data collection <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.