Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-5.42) pro- <br />vides that in planning for the use and development of water and related <br />land resour.::ea consideration ::shall be given to potential Wild, scenic, <br />and recreational ri'l..er areas in river basin and project plan reports, <br />and comparisons are to be made ....ith development alternatives which <br />would be precluded by preserving these areas. <br /> <br />(2) d~6trud:ion. or disruption oj man-made and natural resources <br />elithetic values, community cohesion and the availability of public. <br />fadlities and services; <br /> <br />(3) adverse employment effects and tax and p1'Operty value losses; <br /> <br />(4) injurioull clisp};~.cement of people, busines6es, and farms; and <br /> <br />The Nationa( Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (title Xlli. Public Law <br />90-448) provides that States, to remain eligible for nood insurance. <br />must aclopt accelltable arrangements for land use regulation in flood- <br />prol1e areas. Thill prOVision, together with Executive Order 11296, <br />August 10, 1966, places i:\creased em?hasis on land use regulations <br />and administrative policies as means of reducing flood damages. <br />Planning policiell must include adequate provision for lhese new enact- <br />ments and directives in an integrated program of ilood-pJain managemen~. <br /> <br />(5) disruption o{ desirable commuDity a!1d regiODal growth. <br /> <br />The same Act also includes in Section Z09 the following statement: <br />"It is the iDtent of Congre6s that the objectives o{ enhancing regionaL <br />economic development, the quality of the total envirorunent, including <br />its protection and improvement, the -well~being c>! the people of th~ <br />United States and the n.:ltionaJ economic development are the objectives <br />to be included in federally financed water resourc~ projects, and in the <br />evaluation or benefits and costs attributable thereto, giving due considera- <br />tiCln to the most feasible alternative me'ans o{ accomplishing these <br />objectives. " <br /> <br />The Estuary Protection Act o{ 1968 (Public Law 90~454) outlines <br />a policy oE reB.6Qnable !:-a.lance between the conservation of the Datura! <br />resources ancl n'itural beauty of the Nation'li estuarine areas and the <br />neecl to develop such areas to further thO!; growth and development of <br />the Nation. <br /> <br />The Rural Development Act of 197Z, Public Law 92-419, provides <br />Eor improving the economjc and living conditions of rural America by <br />broadening and strengthening ongoing programs of financial and tech- <br />nical anistance to farmers and rural communities. It provides for the <br />management of agricultural wastes, storage of water for rural needs, <br />recharge of groundwater, fire protection, long term contract program <br />for land treatment, acquisition of laDd rights with other Federal funds, <br />farm research, and a land inventory and monitoring program. <br /> <br />The Nationa.l Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190) <br />authori2:ell and directs Fed~r;a.l agencie5 in the decision-making process <br />to give appropl:'"iate condderation to environmental amenitief\ and values, <br />along with technical considerations. The results of this analysis arc to <br />be included in proposals for Federal action. <br /> <br />The Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970 (title n of <br />Public Law 91-Z24) further emphasizes congrelsional interest in im- <br />proving the environment and the major responsibility that State and <br />local governments have for implementing this policy. <br /> <br />The Federal Water PollutioD Control Act Amendments of 1972, <br />Public Law 92-500, establishes the goals that: <br /> <br />(1) the discharge of pollutantlO into navigable waters be eliminated <br />by 1985; <br /> <br />The Flood Control Act 0[1970 (Public Law 91-611) requires in <br />Section 122 promulgatior. of guidelines desigDed to assure that pos sible <br />adverlle economic, sodal and environmental eUects relating to any pro- <br />posed project have been fully considered in developing suc!t project. and <br />that the final decision::! on thiC! project are made in the best overall pub- <br />lic interest, taking into consideration the need lor flood control, navi- <br />gation and associated purpolles, and the cost of elimina.ting or <br />minimizing such adverse.effects and the follo~ng: <br /> <br />(2) an interim goal of water quality be provided for the protection <br />of fish, ahelHish and wildlife, and for recrea.tion by July 1, 1983; <br /> <br />(3) the discharge o{ toxic pollutants in toxic: amounts be prohibited; <br /> <br />(4) Federal financial assistan,:e be provided to construct publicly <br />owned waste treatment plants; <br /> <br />(1) air, noise, and water pollution; <br /> <br />'(5) water quality and areawide waste treatTnent management plan- <br />ning include multiobjective water reaources and land use planning; <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />FEDERAL RlGI5TER, VOL. 38, NO. 174-MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1973 <br /> <br />o <br />CI <br />o <br />CJ <br />c_ <br />I~ <br /> <br />z <br />o <br />... <br />n <br />m <br />'" <br /> <br />toO <br />.... <br />-.l <br /><=> <br />00 <br />