Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />In the flume experiments, the sand level was observed approximately one-half to <br />one cobble diameter below the surface of the cobble bed, which compared to field <br />observations of sand depth at approximately one-half to one median cobble <br />diameter. O'Brien reported a cobble size range of 50 to 100 mm with a median <br />size of 75 on at the spawning site. Milhous (1982) proposes discharges of <br />approximately one-half that required to initiate cobble movement will be capable <br />of extracting sands and fines from the cobble substrate. Thus, after the supply <br />of sand diminishes, flows of sufficient magnitude and duration are required to <br />scour the cobble bed in preparation for spawning and incubation. Although the <br />location of spawning areas in the Colorado River is not well defined, the <br />presence of larvae near the confl uence of the Gunn i son Ri ver, in the lema to <br />Black. Rock.s reach, and near the confluence of the Dolores River demonstrates <br />that spawning does occur. Kaeding and Osmundson (1987) reported that water <br />temperatures in the Colorado River were suitable for spawning in the Grand <br />Junction area. In 1986, a year of high runoff, suitable tefllleratures for <br />spawning (200) occurred in the first week of August. Miller et al. (1982) and <br />Archer et al. (1986) demonstrated that Colorado sQuawfish often migrate <br />considerable distances to spawn in the Green and Yilf1lla Rivers and similar <br />DDvement has been noted in the mainstem Colorado River. <br /> <br />Miller et al. (1982) concluded from collections of larvae and young-of-year <br />below known spawning sites that there is a downstream drift of larval Colorado <br />sQuawfish followillg hatching. Extensive studies in the Yampa and upper Green <br />Rivers have demonstrated downstream distribution of young Colorado sQuawfish <br />from k.nown spawnillg areas (Archer et al. 1986, Haynes et a1. 1985). Miller <br />et al. (1982) also found that young-of-year Colorado sQuawfish, from late summer <br />through fall. preferred natural backwater areas of D velocity and less than <br />1.5-foot depth over a silt substrate. Juvenile Colorado sQuawfish habitat <br />preferences are siaililr to that of young-of-year fish, but they appear to be <br />lOObile and IIIOre tolerant of lotic conditions away from the sheltered back.water <br />envi rOllllent. <br /> <br />Information on r~o-tagged Colorado sQuawfish that have been observed during <br />fa 11 suggests that fish seek out deepwater areas in the Colorado Ri ver (Mi II er <br />et al. 1982), as do EIlY other riverine species. River pools, runs, and other <br />deepwater areas, especially in upstream reaches, are important winter habitats <br />for Colorado sQuawfisll. <br /> <br />Very little infol1liltion is available on the influence of turbidity on the <br />endangered Colorado River fishes. It is assumed, however. that turbidity is <br />important, particularly as it affects the interaction between introduced fishes <br />and the endeaic Col~o River fishes. Since these endemic fishes have evolved <br />under natural coMntions of high turbidity, it is concluded that the retention <br />of these highly turbid conditions is an illllortant factor for these endangered <br />fishes. ReductiOl of turbidity may enable introduced species to gain a <br />c~etitive edge llIIiB could further contribute to the decl ine of the endangered <br />Colorado River fi~. <br />