Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />this reach during the spawning season: (c) the occurrence of larvae in and <br />downstream of the reach: and (d) the availability of suitable physical habitat <br />conditions in the reach. <br /> <br />At certain flow regimes, the IS-mile reach above the Gunnison confluence appears <br />to have all the necessary physical components to support spawning (i.e., cobble <br />substrate and riffles adjacent to deep pools>. Field studies of the confirmed <br />spawning sites in the Yampa and Green Rivers indicate that Colorado sQuawfish <br />use this type of habitat for adult staging and deposition of eggs. In addition, <br />water telllleratures in the 15-mi 1 e reach do reach temperatures conducive to <br />Co 1 orado sQuawfi sh s~awni ng. <br /> <br />The IS-mile reach is actively used by Colorado sQuawfi sh throughout the year for <br />a variety of purposes (spawning, wintering, general adult use, etc.). The <br />Service believes that these data point to the need to prevent further <br />degradation of adult Colorado sQuawfish habitat in the 15-mile reach. <br /> <br />HUMPBACK CHUB <br /> <br />Two major populations of humpback. chub (.!il.l.g ~) occur in the upper Colorado <br />River at the Black Rocks area of Ruby Canyon (river miles 135 to 137) and in <br />Westwater Canyon (river mil es 116 to 124). Because these reaches are deep and <br />narrow, the Service believes that major flow changes would be necessary to <br />significantly reduce the availabil ity of deepwater habitat used by adult fish. <br />It is expected that the conservation measures included in this opinion to <br />protect the Colorado sQUawfi sh a 150 wi 11 minimi ze adverse impacts to the <br />hlJlT1)back. chub. For this reason, the Service has determined that the proposed <br />action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of this species. <br /> <br />BONYTAll CHUB <br /> <br />little is ~ about the biological requirements of the bony tail chub, as the <br />species greatly declined in numbers in the upper basin shortly after 1960. <br />Until recently, the Service considered the species extirpated from the upper <br />basin. However, a ~imen collected at Black Rock.s in 1985 which exhibits many <br />bony tail characteristics could indicate a small, extant population (Kaeding <br />et al. 1986). Also, during recent studies, several suspected bonytai 1 chub have <br />been captured in Cataract Canyon (Valdez 1988). It is assumed that if this <br />species persists in the Colorado River, its preferred habitat would be extensive <br />reaches of the river downstream from the area of direct influence of this <br />project. The conservation measures included in this opinion for Colorado <br />sQuawfish will help to preserve the natural conditions of the Colorado River and <br />should preserve any nseining habitats of the bony tail chub. Therefore, the <br />Service has detel1lined that the effects of water withdrawals due to this Federal <br />action are not likely to further jeopardize the continued exi stence of the <br />bonytai 1 clUl. <br />