My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04710
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:32:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8056
Description
Drought Preparedness
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
6/1/1997
Author
Donald Wilhite
Title
Improving Drought Management in the West
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Improving Drought Management ;n the West: The Role of Mjrigation and Preparedness <br /> <br />In the study referred to above (Wilhite, 1993a), the survey instrument <br />purposely did not define the term "mitigation." States were given flexibility to <br />define mitigation by including actions or activities that they felt were <br />appropriate. However, the definition given above was used to help <br />understand and cluster the actions and activities reported by States. <br />Mitigation activities identified by States and/or local municipalities during <br />recent droughts were diverse, reflecting regional differences in impacts, legal <br />and institutional constraints, and institutional arrangements associated with <br />drought plans. The diversity in responses was also related to the wide range <br />of State agencies with principal authority for drought planning and <br />mitigation (e.g., agriculture, natural resources, water resources, emergency or <br />disaster management). <br /> <br />State mitigation actions used to address issues during recent droughts are <br />clustered into nine primary areas in table 1. These actions represent a full <br />range of possible mitigative actions, from monitoring and assessment <br />programs to the development of drought contingency plans, Some of the <br />actions included were adopted by many States, while others may have been <br />adopted only in a single case. It is clear, however, that the existence of a <br />drought contingency plan facilitated the timely adoption and implementation <br />of many of these mitigation actions. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Assessment programs adopted by States range from developing improved <br />criteria or triggers for the initiation of specific actions in response to drought <br />to establishing new data collection networks. Automated networks such as <br />those that exist in Nebraska, California, and Oklahoma have significantly <br />improved the State's monitoring capability, One of the three critical <br />components of a drought plan is a comprehensive early warning system. <br />Parameters that must be monitored to detect the early onset of drought <br />include temperature and precipitation, streamflow, reservoir and <br />groundwater levels, snowpack, and soil moisture. Each of these parameters <br />represents different components of the hydrologic system and, therefore, <br />impact sectors (e.g., agriculture, energy, transportation, recreation and <br />tourism). To assess emerging drought conditions, these data must be <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.