My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04705
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:32:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.600.30A
Description
John Martin Reservoir - Other Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1950
Title
Administration of Caddoa Reservoir - 1950 -- Part 1 of 4
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />_:e_ <br /> <br />Bon. G.L. Ireland - 9 <br /> <br />4-26-4S <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />t\:) <br />~ <br />... <br />(,II <br /> <br />of 1lllregulated stream flow by Colorado ditches IUIY1I'here in the ArkaDJlaJl River <br /> <br />basin in Colorado, to meet requested deliveries of water to Kansas according <br /> <br />to quotae mentioned in the stipuletion. <br /> <br />The state Engineer "Was told by' these representatives that his con- <br /> <br />ception was contrary- to thsir interpretation of tl1e terma of the stipulation <br />and to what the,. had been aariaed by counsel. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As the reJlult or theae view., a resolution was adopted by the repre- <br />sentatives of the ditches present, which, in sUbstence, provided that counsel <br />for the Ditch Association confer with the state Engineer end Attorne,. General <br />and that prior to eq agreelD8m. being em.ared iIIto bet_en the water officials <br /> <br />of the two states, their recommendations or conclusiont be referred by counsel, <br /> <br />to the Foxecut.ive Collllllittee of the D1t ch Aaaociation. <br /> <br />Those present were edvlsed that I would re(;!uest an opinion from you '"li,- ; . i' <br /> <br />as to - <br /> <br />1. The correctness of the state Engineer's interpret:rt.ion of the <br /> <br />provisions and terms of the Stipulation as above set ottt.. <br /> <br />2. The aasumed date on which the stipulation becomes erfectlvs, ViZI <br /> <br />"TIhen such dam shall have been constructed", or when "Weter beglm to be storid <br /> <br />in said reservoir", <br /> <br />5. The tem.ative agreelR'Jnt proposed to be e::ltered into with the repre- <br /> <br />sentative of Kansas, with certain modifications su.:;;gested in Mr. Knapp's letter <br /> <br />of April 19th, copies of which are attached hereto. <br /> <br />e) _ _. _ 4. The right of t~e State Engineer t" rest:dct diversione of water by" <br />Colorado ditches in accordance nth th';ir decreed pr-forities, -rr-need -be;-to. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.