Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2220 <br /> <br />TABLE II <br /> <br />Comparison of Projected Total Dissolved Solids Concentration <br />i'l Surface Waters <br /> <br /> -- <br /> TDS in "lamp a River n~ci.r TDS in White River neci.r TDS in Green River near <br /> M<ivbe 11, Colcradc' , mg/i* Watson, Utah, mg!l* OuraV, Utah, mg!I'" - <br /> with without wHh without <br /> :Meeker Spring Meeker Soring Meek~r Soring Meeker Soring <br />Pre Prcit',ct 139 439 j62 392 J83 <br />One t.t: One <br />Salt BaIanc" 140 469 397 396 386 -- <br />Leaching by Prclect 147 5,3) 451 405 395 <br /> <br />"'Concentratic'ns ar" flow weighted mean. <br /> <br />, <br />N <br />'"' <br /> <br />TABLE III <br /> <br />Comparison cf Damage Caused by Hardness <br />Rangely, Colorado <br /> <br /> Iiardness in White River at Rangely'''* Benefits resulting from Be.nef i ts resulting from <br /> mg!l as CaCO, Pre,iect O~eration in 1965**" Proiect Operation in 2065*** <br /> with without with without with without <br /> Meeker Spring Meeker Spring Meeker Soring Meeker SJ:>r ing Meeker Spring Meeker Spring <br />Pre Pro;ect 202 191 +$300 +$900 <br />One to One <br />Salt Balance 216 205 -$400 ~$100 -$1000 ~$100 <br />Leaching by <br />Pro.iect 245 234 -$1300 .,$1000 ~$3400 ~$2500 <br /> <br />* Concentrations are given as flow weighted mean since they do not vary much from average concentrations. <br />** Data figures calculated for Watson but the river does not change in quality significantly between the two towns. <br />***Based on cost of $2.00 per person per 100 mg/l hardness (11, 12). <br />