My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04648
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04648
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:14:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:30:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.131.J
Description
Yellow Jacket Project
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1966
Title
Water Quality Control Study of the Yellow Jacket Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C) <br /> <br />C\1 <br />C\1 <br /> <br />There is only one oil refinery in the area, that at Rangely. Its <br />1960 through-put was 120,000 barrels, less than onahalf of one percent <br />of the oil produced in the area. Hence, more than 99 percent of the oil <br />is exported outside the area--mostly to refineries at Salt Lake City, <br />Utah, and Sinclair, Wyoming. All the major fields in the area tie into <br />the double pipeline to Salt Lake City or the central Wyoming pipeline. <br />This reduces the probability of more refineries being built in the area <br />or expansion of the existing one, which had, in fact, suspended operation <br />in 1965. <br /> <br />The output of natural gas which is generally a joint product with <br />crude oil has varied with the production of oil, In 1960, the output <br />figure was 65,668,473 Mcf (thousand cubic feet), A greater amount of <br />this gas, however, is finding economic use. In 1952, only 2.1 percent <br />of the gas produced was sold, 3 percent was used to repressure oil wells, <br />18 percent to drive pump motors and 75 percent was vented unused into <br />the atmosphere. By contrast in 1960, 51 percent was sold, 33 percent <br />used to repressure oil wells, 13 percent used as fuel for pumping motors <br />and only 3 percent released into the air. This is still a smaller <br />utilization than of gas produced elsewhere in the state. This area <br />was responsible for 43.3 percent of the gas produced in the state in <br />1964, but only 26.4 percent of gas sales, <br /> <br />The second most important mining activity in this area is coal <br />mining, Coal mining generally has been a declining industry in recent <br />years. However, it is showing signs of resurgence in the study area. <br /> <br />Coal Production (tons) <br /> <br />1940 <br />973,492 <br /> <br />1950 <br />998,367 <br /> <br />1960 <br />606,614 <br /> <br />1963 <br /> <br />illi <br /> <br />951,700 <br /> <br />1,081,864 <br /> <br />The value of the 1964 production was $5,495,869. The market is primarily <br />to public utilities with most of the coal from the area being shipped by <br />railroad to Denver. The domestic and commercial markets are very small. <br />The coal is exclusively of the bituminous and sub~bituminous variety, <br />with area reserves estimated at 20 billion tons, Most of the current <br />production is from strip mines. The construction of a large REA power- <br />plant at Hayden, Colorado, which was opened for operation in June 1965, <br />is expected to double the coal production in the area. The Chief Coal <br />Mine Inspector for the State of Colorado foresees a tripling of production <br />in the next ten years. Further in the future and further into the realm <br />of speculation is the possibility of construction of a slurry line to <br />the west coast. This would greatly expand the potential market for coal <br />from this area. It would also greatly increase the water requirement of <br />the indus try. <br /> <br />The third major mineral product of the area in the past few years, <br />also an energy mineral, has been uranium. The mining and milling operation <br />at Maybell, Colorado, produced about 600,000 pounds of uranium oxide in <br /> <br />-18- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.