My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04643
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:14:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:30:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.143.A
Description
Smith Fork (Crawford) Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
2/1/1951
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Smith Fork Project Colorado: A Supplement to the Colorado River Storage Project Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c' <br /> <br />e-. <br /> <br />'-. <br /> <br />CHAPTER I <br /> <br />G ENE R A L DES C RIP T ION <br /> <br />. Project Plan <br /> <br />The Smith Fork project in western Colorado would regulate surplus <br />flows of Iron Creek and the. Smith Fork of the Gunnison River to increase <br />the irrigation supply for 8,160 acres of land and provide a new irriga- <br />tion supply for 2,270 acres. The flows would be regulated in a 14,000- <br />acre-foot reservoir (13,000 acre-foot active capacity) to be built at <br />the Cre.wford site on Iron Creek. In 100 years of operation sediment <br />is expected to occupy 1,000 acre-feet of active capacity and 500 acre- <br />feet of inactive capacity. <br /> <br />Surplus Smith Fork run....off wtluld be brought to the reservoir by <br />the Smith Fork Feeder Canal, a structure 2-3/4 miles long and with a <br />capacity of 100 second-feet. Releases from the reservoir would be made <br />into the potential Aspen Canal, a structure 6.6 miles long and with an <br />initial capacity of 145 second-feet, that would serve lams along Cot- <br />tonwood Creek and Grand View Mesa. This canal would replace the smaller <br />hspen ditch now serving the Grand View Mesa lands. It wtluld feed exist- <br />ing ditches, including the Clipper, the Grand View, and the lower por- <br />tion of the Needle Rock, which would continue to be used under project <br />development. In addition, four minor laterals would be provided to <br />deliver water to project lands. <br /> <br />Most of the water made available to Grand View Mesa and Cotton- <br />wood Creek lands would be utilized as a new or supplemental supply. <br />Some of the water 1 however, would replace direct flow diversions from <br />Smith Fork, thus permitting additional direct flow to be diverted to <br />the Upper Smith Fork Basin. The additional water for the basin would <br />be diverted from the river by the upper portion of the Needle Rock <br />ditch and other existing ditches. <br /> <br />The supply for lands in Lower Smith Fork Canyon would be increased <br />by additional return flow resulting from project development. The <br />increased supply for these lands would be diverted by existing ditches. <br /> <br />The Smith Fork project plan is correlated with a broad plan for <br />the fullest possible development of the land and water resources of <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin. The project is among the first <br />developments recommended by States of the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin for participation in the benefits and revenues of the Colorado <br />River Storage project, the master project in the plan for upper basin <br />development. Additional information on the relation of the Smith Fork <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.