My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04606
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:56:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:27:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.400
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1960
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Reevaluation Statement Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Total annual benefits <br /> <br />Total <br />$2~283~MO <br /> <br />1.323,100 <br /> <br />$3~606~500 <br /> <br />Taxes <br />included <br />~,531~100 <br /> <br /> <br />- ...... "1' ,- <br />. ."\ <br />~I \." <br /> <br />Power <br /> <br />Recently published studies by the Federal Power Commission <br />on alternative costs of steam power in market areas of the Upper <br />Colorado River Storage Project were used to evaluate power benefits. <br />One of the subareas included in the Federal Power Commission's data <br />covered southeastern Colorado which will be the principal market <br />area for electric energy from the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. <br /> <br />In the absence of the project, it was assumed that the <br />make-up of future power supplies in southeastern Colorado would <br />consist of a combination of private, local public, and Federal <br />developments. Colorado Springs and other municipalities in the <br />area already have municipal power systems. There is some federally <br />financed generating capacity in the area resulting from the REA <br />program. Analysis of the pattern of the existing supply indicates <br />that approximately 30 percent would be private development; 60 <br />percent, local public; and 10 percent, Federal. <br /> <br />Capacity values in the alternative cost studies vary <br />for each of the components as they reflect differences in costs <br />of financing, taxes, and other fixed charges. The total costs <br />per kilowatt of dependable capacity at load center for these <br />components are approximately $33.00 for private steam plants, <br />~~15.50 for Federal plants, and $19.00 for local public plants. <br />The weighted average cost is ~~22. 79 per kilowatt. The incremental <br />cost of energy generation and its transmission to load center was <br />calculated at 2.82 mills per kilowatt-hour regardless of the type <br />of financing. <br /> <br />The dependable capacity of the project hydroelectric <br />system is estimated at 100~200 kilowatts at approximately 57 percent <br />load factor. Allowance of 7-1/2 percent for transmission losses on <br />average annual generation of 507.2 million kilowatt-hours prOVides <br />469.2 million kilowatt-hours at load centers. A summary of the <br />alternative power values follows: <br /> <br />Item <br />Composite capacity value ($22.79 x 100~200 kw.) <br /> <br />Energy value (2.82 mills x 469,200,000 kwhr.) <br /> <br />$531,100 <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.