Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:2'; 1e~timates. The previous and present pondage capacities are as follows, <br /> <br />Forebay capacity--Princeton Pow~rplant <br />Forebay capacity--Pancho powerp1.anb <br />Salida Forebay <br />Salida Afterbay <br /> <br />Previous <br />(acre-feet) <br />500 <br />200 <br />250 <br />200 <br /> <br />Pre sent <br />(acre-feet) <br />500 <br />250 <br />300 <br />300 <br /> <br />The hourly operation studies took advantage of the additienal <br />check structures now provided in the power canals which will permi.t <br />change in power releases as may be necessary to. meet load requirements. <br />Power releases from Salida Afterbay were held to plUS or mi.nus 25 per <br />cent of average releases to avoid a wide fluctuation of river flow <br />below Salida. <br /> <br />Irrigation and municipal water supplies <br /> <br />Previous water supply studies for irrigation were based on <br />a service area figure of 322,000 acres and the 1911-1944 period. With <br />the organization of the conservancy district, the total irrigation <br />service area was reduced to 280,600 acres. About 267,800 acres are <br />situated in the Arkansas River Valley and will receive direct service <br />by the project. The Fountain River Valley lands of about 12,800 acres <br />can be served only b.y return flows from municipal water used b.y <br />Colorado Springs. <br /> <br />Reduction of the project acreage and extension of the water <br />supply data necessitated revision of the original reservoir operation <br />study. Because revised transmountain importations varied only <br />slightly from the original estimates, it was considered necessary to <br />revise only the operation of the terminal Pueblo. Reservoir. Thus <br />imported water, plus storable Arkansas River flood flows, plus past <br />winter diversions, was regulated in the Pueblo. Reservoir so that <br />irrigation supplies and benefits under the revised acreage could be <br />determined. With respect to irrigation, this operation study gives <br />the same results as would a combined power and irrigation operation <br />except fer the effect of evaporation from upstream reservoirs. SUch <br />evaporation would reduce the project yield and introduce mi.nor errors <br />in the spills. These factors, however, were accounted for by analysis <br />and their effects are reflected in the irrigation benefits. The <br />Pueblo Reservoir study was made for the period 1911-1957. <br /> <br />The preproject headgate shortage for the 267,800 acres of <br />Arkansas Valley lands in the service area is 317,200 acre-feet <br />annually for the 47 years of study. The post-project headgate <br />shortage for these lands for the same period would be 154,100 acre- <br />feet annually. Thus, the project would alleviate J.63,100 acre,.feet <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />