My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04600
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:56:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:27:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.100
Description
Salinity Projects Not Located in Colorado - Colorado River Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1996
Title
Report to Congress on the Bureau of Reclamation Basinwide Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Implementation Plan <br /> <br />. Operation and maintenance - Some proposals may be more or less <br />susceptible to poor O&M practices. To minimize this risk factor, <br />applicants may offer "robust" solutions that require relatively little <br />maintenance. For example, buried irrigation laterals require little <br />attention, while open concrete ditches are more prone to weathering <br />and require annual maintenance to remain fully effective. <br /> <br />The ranking team will consider the risk that the Government's capital <br />investments may be lost from poor maintenance. In the past, <br />Reclamation has provided supplemental, annual O&M funding to <br />maintain certain projects. Reclamation has found this difficult to fund <br />and administer. If essential to the continued performance of the <br />project, the program will consider (or may require) funding an <br />O&M trust to cost share the maintenance of capital improvements <br />and safeguard the program's investment. If funded by the program, <br />this cost would be included in the proposal's cost-effectiveness <br />computation. <br /> <br />. Management - Generally, projects that rely on a high degree of <br />management to maintain their efficiency will be downgraded unless <br />there is reason to believe it is sustainable. Highly automated <br />systems that are simple to operate will reduce this risk. For example, <br />automatic sprinkler shutoffs would improve management risks. <br /> <br />. Measurable or verifiable results - Projects in which the salt load <br />reduction can be independently verified add a degree of certainty to <br />the proposal. For example, interception of saline springs is a highly <br />verifiable method (both water volume and concentration can be <br />directly measured). Irrigation delivery system improvements are <br />somewhat more difficult to measure, but shallow monitoring wells <br />next to the lined canal can confirm the absence of seepage, and <br />drainwater can be used to measure concentration. Onfarm deep <br />percolation reductions may vary significantly from farm-to-farm and <br />from year-to-year. Statistical sampling may be required. <br /> <br />. Other factors - Any factors that might reduce the expected <br />performance and degrade the actual (realized) cost effectiveness of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Although the details of each proposal will be evaluated for performance risk, <br />the following practices would typically rank from lowest risk to highest risk: <br /> <br />. Industrial processes that interrupt brine source, treat the brine, <br />produce a measured (weighed) product, and bill the program. <br />Payments are made annually as salt is produced (or controlled). 00 ('I 2: 3 <br />Measurement of salt is very accurate and only influenced by moisture ' <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.