My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04581
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04581
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:56:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:26:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8170
Description
Arkansas Basin Water Quality Issues
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1996
Author
USGS
Title
Relations of Discharge and Specific-Conductance Trends to Reservoir Operations in the Lower Arkansas River - Southeastern Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1921 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Reservoir. Data from the two stations located downstream from John Martin Reservoir were analyzed for trends <br /> <br />that may have occurred after the implementation of a new reservoir operating plan in 1980. The nonparametric <br /> <br />Mann- Whitney- Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for trends analysis. <br /> <br />At the upper-basin station, discharge increased significantly and specific conductance decreased signifi- <br /> <br />cantlyafter 1974 during the low-flow months of January. February, and March. Thesc trends apparently were <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />caused by the increased importation of low-specific conductance water from the Colorado River Basin into the <br /> <br />Arkansas River. At the three stations located between Pueblo Reservoir and John Martin Reservoir, discharge and <br /> <br />specific conductance were affected by Pueblo Reservoir operations and by changes in the quantity and quality of <br /> <br />inflow from the upper basin. At the two stations located 0.4 miles and 24 miles downstream from Pueblo Reservoir. <br /> <br />discharge generally increased during most months of the growing season and decreased during November through <br /> <br />February after 1974. The discharge trends at these two stations are largely attributed to the storage of water in <br /> <br />Pueblo Reservoir during the winter months and the release of that stored water during the growing season to meet <br /> <br />downstream irrigation needs. Immediately downstream from Pueblo Reservoir, specific conductance decreased <br /> <br />during most months between September and April and increased during the high-flow months of May and June. <br /> <br />This trend was caused by the mixing of low-specific conductance water and high-specific conductance water in <br /> <br />Pueblo Reservoir, thus narrowing the annual range in specific conductance in the reservoir outflow. Few trends. <br /> <br />with the exception of increased specific conductance in June, August, and December. were detected in specific con- <br /> <br />ductance at the station located 24 miles downstream from Pueblo Reservoir apparently because of increased inflow <br /> <br />of relatively high-specific conductance water from Fountain Creek. At Las Animas. located 120 miles downstream <br /> <br />from Pueblo Reservoir. discharge increased during all months after 1974. but specific conductance exhibited litTle <br /> <br />change. <br /> <br />At the two stations located downstream from John Martin Reservoir. specific conductance was affected by <br /> <br />changes in John Martin Reservoir operations and by a decrease in the specific conductance of the reservoir inflow. <br /> <br />Specific conductance decreased during October through April and exhibited no significant changes during May <br /> <br />. through August. Additionally, it appears that the timing of the minimum annual specific conductance changed from <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.